Recent Comments

Thanks for explaining that, I appreciate it. I still think that the right to abortion should be there... but I think it would be better if people chose to allow the baby to live. I'm going to google the parent support groups. I think I might be interested in helping them out, if possible.

Joanne, you might not have seen evidence spelled out in the press release. That's why you have to go to the site -- prolifeprofiles.com . There you will see, spelled out, the several things that she's said which deny her claims that she's as pro-life as she says.

Example: Asked about whether the Morning After Pill (an abortifacient) should be banned, she said, "I don't think that it should necessarily be illegal." She also hasn't backed any Personhood measures, either at the state level or at the federal level. That's the definition of the Right to Life.

The heading "ARTL questions Palin's pro-life credentials" led me to think that Palin had been pro-choice at one time, or that she had done or said something inconsistent with her very public pro-life image. But nothing in the article suggests that. What is there to question about her? If there is something phoney in her position please produce the evidentce. It is damaging to the pro-life movement - and unfair - to dump a suspicion on her and then run without offering any reason for raising the suspicion. Before I read the above post, I believed her credentials were impeccable. I see nothing in the post to change that opinion.

If Hodan sells his abortion clinics, will others buy them and keeep them running? We need to see them shut down.

It really nice to be part of it. Can i be send the full details.

As a pro-life activist for three decades, I find myself constantly begging writers to be more complete in their reference to Roe v. Wade, particularly on late term abortions; Doe v. Bolton is critical to understanding the full reality of today’s abortions. Two specific questions should be answered.

WHY do leaders of the pro-abortion establishment make it a point NEVER to mention Doe v. Bolton?

And WHY do many pro-life leaders cooperate with the abortion establishment by ignoring Doe v. Bolton when they refer to Roe v. Wade?

The pro-abortion crowd knows that when the average person understands how Doe changed Roe, they become more educated on the totality of the abortion evil.

To ignore Doe v. Bolton is to cooperate with the abortion establishment's strategy of keeping Doe v. Bolton buried far from the abortion debate. Even the Supreme Court said these twin decisions must be read together.

We know that if Roe is reversed Doe becomes irrelevant, but that has nothing to do with people understanding how Doe expanded the reach of Roe; millions more of our preborn citizens were sentenced to a violent death, even to partial-birth infanticide. Writers for Life

I agree with the above two comments. You preach that the government should take away the lives of murderers- or more appropriately if you're at the standpoint of a conservative, take away the liberties of murderers. Wasn't America founded on liberty and justice? Protection from the inhumanity and abuse of big government? Doesn't God forgive sinners for their sin?

But now you proclaim as an honest, loyal conservative that as a Christian society we should condemn killers and do so by stripping their freedoms, protection and not allowing them to repent their sin. You uphold freedom for yourself, but what about freedom for those who committed a crime? Yes they committed a crime, but let them serve life without parole in prison. God forgives sinners. Come on my fellow good Christian, ever heard: Father, forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us?

And by no means is the American justice system bullet proof. Innocent people are locked up for crimes as false convictions. Why? Well because the system has its flaws. Now what if we lock up innocent lives and "hang them by the guillotine"? What kind of society does that make us appear as? Not far from fascism.

It's not crazy libs that produce such convictions of moral wrong in the pro-death, pro-military, pro-life phenomenon. It really is a matter of common sense. Perhaps we can live as a society in our capital laws. But if we kill people for murder (an eye for an eye) then what is the difference between us and the barbarians of ancient Rome and Carthage? By blind definition, there is no difference. They executed persons for petty crimes, they had large militarys, they were greedy bastards. If we take into account America, I see the same. We have persons executed for petty crimes, we have large militarys, we're greedy bastards. We're no more humane than our ancient descendants.

It's long been evident that Obama is cowed by women; intimidated and "at their service" lest they frown and scold. He doesn't have the guts nor Godly decency to stand up against women, so he caters to them on every whim.

On the other hand, women have gotten SO scared to deliver babies the way God created them to that they whine "...life in danger" and such cowardice against their own created nature. They fear the pain of life, so they will ultimately face the eternal pain of death for their evil against babies.

Gary

What about death penalty Getrude?
Just to let you know, I'm not for abortion. I will never support someone who wants to do. I think if we are really about prolife and we are good Christian, we shoud stand against death penalty also. Because it does the same thing. Like you said. "Killing our best product-HUMAN BEINGS."

Please stop killing our babies! Use the other option---adoption!

Please acknowledge how this health care bill is
so against what American people want for
themselves, their families and elderly.
The evil of abortion killing is so forefront. I
honestly feel and know it will destroy the
American Nation.

STOP STOP STOP the insanity.
You are killing our best product - HUMAN BEINGS

Totally agree with the above comment from Anonymous. Label yourself correctly...you are NOT pro life. You are pro life only in the abortion issue but you do not care if people get killed by the death penalty or in war.

You have convinced yourself that war protects the innocent but you block out the fact that war ALWAYS kills civilians.

You even think that Iraq had something to do with 911. You really need to get out i the world and figure out how thinngs work.

Iraq is worse off now than before the war. THe new government is religious and the women have to wear veils. Before the war, they did not have to do this. Now they have absolutely NO FREEDOM!!!

I REJECT BILL AB 458 that would require that students be taught about a number of activities that could endanger their health and could result in a growing number of teen sexually transmitted diseases, pregnancies and abortions.

If you really think about it your ignorant. Think about all the times your child is going to wonder why her mother did not want her. Why you abandoned her. Abortion is an option, not for everyone. No matter what family she is put into, she will always have something missing, which was caused by you and your lack of consideration for your child and her life. We have enough insane people in this world, stop reproducing unless you love the person. It is because people like you we are over populated.

I'll be there! What an awesome site! Please pray for the mothers as well!

When I read about the “stunning” drop in abortions, as though to say, look how many lives we’re saving; it reveals how desperate we are for some kind of success to assuage our frustration for not having ended legal abortion after almost 4 decades and 50 million preborn citizens killed. It may be intended to motivate pro-lifers; I believe it’s a detriment that misplaces our time and energy. We’re told also that we are making “significant” strides in ending abortions; that’s denying reality. Most states can boast a drop in abortions, how does that become a “significant” stride in ending abortion?

The fact that the abortion count has decreased over the last 30 plus years is irrelevant to the total number of abortions because we don’t know how many years legal abortion will continue. President Obama has recently thrown open the “blood-gates” and that’s a significant stride for prolonging legal abortion in America and worldwide.

After three decades in the pro-life movement, I've come to believe it’s time for changes in the structure, strategy, efficiency, and attitude of the pro-life movement. Our pro-life groups have had some success, but the ultimate goal to end legal abortion, has been a dismal failure. Is it possible that our overall pro-life strategy is inherently flawed and counterproductive to our goal to end legal abortion? Writers for Life, prolifedigest.com.

These are all very brave people...to stand up to
Pelosi and Reid...and the White House hoodlums
these are the people we need to support whether
their Dems or Republicans , so long as their
Social Agenda is what our Forefathers would have
wanted....Life and Liberty.
Keep up the good work Glenn Beck, the real American Patriot
God Bless You All
Gene Graves
Conservative Christian

I had a different kind of quiestion. It is about people on life support.My daughter was told in school that she needed to write a persuasive essay, and she chose abortion, but they told her she needed to find something else to write about because to many people had an opinion on that subject.So she chose to write about people that are on life support. If you have no body function of your own,and they take you off life support is that not murder also? This is what she has asked me and I would appreciate your feedback.

The problem is Dr.Charles Murray doesn't have a clue of what he is talking about. Bush funding restriction was on embryonic stem cells not adult stem cell. Adult stem cell are the cell being used to treat heart disease, not embryonic stem cells. There are many places in the world having great success treating heart disease with adult stem cells The fight between embryonic stem cells, and adult stem cells is over, winner aduld cells.

Your post is interesting as an example of someone who has already taken an ideological stand on an issue and then rearranges the "facts" to fit the ideology.

You say Germany "doesn't waste time or money on stem cell research that does not now, and may never, treat patients i.e. embryonic stem cell research and cloning." Not true. Legitimate stem cell researchers (e.g., Max Planck Institute, Robert Koch Institute, etc.) are working tirelessly to develop safe and effective stem cell-based treatments, whether using embryonic stem cells or so-called adult stem cells. The XCell center in Cologne is a bogus operation that does not offer scientific evidence of the success of its treatments. It instead relies on the comments of patients, most of whom are experiencing a placebo effect, but no real improvement in conditions.

Secondly, what do you think happens to the thousands of unused embryos frozen at IVF clinics? They are destroyed. Period. Without any research being done on them. Why aren't you doing something to stop that, if you're so concerned about embryos?

Lastly, the FDA approval system is in place to protect patients. That's what bothers the shady doctors in the U.S. who are dying to perform unproven stem cell treatments for megabucks. Do you really want to undergo a treatment that has not been rigorously tested for effectiveness and safety before going on the market? Probably not. But it's much easier to curse the FDA rather than admit the truth about the con artists like XCell Center.

Pro-lifers have been discussing, and debating, contraception for decades; pro-choicers and their supporters use it, as they have with other issues, to shift the debate away from the civil rights of the new person in the womb. Contraception is the personal choice of those who practice it, and like any serious decision, they are responsible for the actions that follow from that choice. Contraception (that is not abortifacient) is related to abortion as a condition, not as a cause. The two issues, abortion (the act of killing a person) and contraception (that does not abort) are not intrinsically related; they are separate and distinct in their cause and effect. Pro-lifers must insist on holding the debate to the core question; then the end of legal abortion is inevitable. Writers for Life

I AM SO FOR LIFE! I DO NOT LIKE ABORTION!
I HATE THAT PEOPLE WILL CREATE SOMETHING SO GOOD LIKE THAT AND THEN TARE IT APART! THATS JUST WRONG ON THEIR PART! I DONT THINK THAT IF YOU MAKE A BABY AND THEN CANT RAISE IT JUST PUT IT UP FOR ADOPTION! I THINK THAT MR.OBAMA NEEDS TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS FACTOR NOW!

My youngest sister has Down Syndrome. Seeing this ad is seriously disturbing. Maybe Whoopi is over-compensating now for the bad choices she's made...but really, all that aside...IS THIS THE BEST TOYS'R'US CAN DO!?!?!?!?!?

What do you expect, when the term 'Whore,' is no longer "politically correct." It has been replaced, with,'sexually active.' Let's face it, todays men and women no longer discriminate when it comes to each other. That's because the term,'Lady' and 'Gentleman' has also disappeared, among the "politically correct" crowd. Homosexuality and bi-sexuality are now acceptable, suddenly, ancient Rome doesn't look all that ancient anymore.