<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:lang="en">
<title>ProLifeBlogs</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/" />
<modified>2010-02-08T03:28:18Z</modified>
<tagline></tagline>
<id>tag:www.prolifeblogs.com,2010:/articles/2</id>
<generator url="http://www.movabletype.org/" version="4.23-en">Movable Type</generator>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2010, plb</copyright>

<entry>
<title>Tebow Super Bowl Ad Creates Ruckus?</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2010/02/tebow_super_bow.php" />
<modified>2010-02-08T03:28:18Z</modified>
<issued>2010-02-08T03:19:55Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.prolifeblogs.com,2010:/articles/2.5402</id>
<created>2010-02-08T03:19:55Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"> Football hero Tim Tebow appeared in a Super Bowl ad with his mother, who says she loves her son. So, why all the fuss?...</summary>
<author>
<name>plb</name>
<url>http://www.twitter.com/prolifeblogs</url>
<email>prolifeblogs@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Commentary</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/">
 Football hero Tim Tebow appeared in a Super Bowl ad with his mother, who says she loves her son. So, why all the fuss?
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Call for Life Today!</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2010/02/call_for_life_t_15.php" />
<modified>2010-02-05T16:40:06Z</modified>
<issued>2010-02-05T15:01:05Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.prolifeblogs.com,2010:/articles/2.4876</id>
<created>2010-02-05T15:01:05Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">
    

It&apos;s the first Friday of the month and it&apos;s time to call for LIFE!
Thank you for all you do for the unborn. Without us speaking out for them, they would die in silence, killed by abortion or embryonic stem cell research. In the end, our representatives, through our prodding, will do the right thing and end abortion and human killing research.
I would like to ask everyone to do one more thing for the unborn this month. Please contact at least 2 people who might do just a little bit more to help the unborn and encourage them to join us in the Monthly Call for Life. It&apos;s only once a month, and it&apos;s so easy! Go to monthlycallforlife.com for everything you need to say and do.</summary>
<author>
<name>peter</name>
<url>http://www.monthlycallforlife.com/</url>
<email>peter@prolifeunity.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Abortion</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/">
 It&apos;s the first Friday of the month and it&apos;s time to call for LIFE! Thank you for all you do for the unborn. Without us speaking out for them, they would die in silence, killed by abortion or embryonic stem cell research. In the end, our representatives, through our prodding, will do the right thing and end abortion and human killing research. I would like to ask everyone to do one more thing for the unborn this month. Please contact at least 2 people who might do just a little bit more to help the unborn and encourage them to join us in the Monthly Call for Life. It&apos;s only once a month, and it&apos;s so easy! Go to monthlycallforlife.com for everything you need to say and do. Pro-Life Unity - prolifeunity.com United we stand - Divided they die Pass it on
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>New Stanek WND column, &quot;With Roeder trial, abortion dodges another bullet&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2010/02/new_stanek_wnd_115.php" />
<modified>2010-02-03T14:00:27Z</modified>
<issued>2010-02-03T13:59:59Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.prolifeblogs.com,2010:/articles/2.5395</id>
<created>2010-02-03T13:59:59Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"> The actual translation of Exodus 20:13 from the Hebrew is, &quot;Thou shalt not murder,&quot; indicating a premeditated, uncivil act. The Bible considers murder the ultimate violation of the sanctity of human life, requiring the ultimate punishment. So Exodus 21:14...</summary>
<author>
<name>jill stanek</name>
<url>http://www.jillstanek.com/</url>
<email>jillstanek@comcast.net</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/">
 The actual translation of Exodus 20:13 from the Hebrew is, &quot;Thou shalt not murder,&quot; indicating a premeditated, uncivil act. The Bible considers murder the ultimate violation of the sanctity of human life, requiring the ultimate punishment. So Exodus 21:14 makes perfect sense to state, &quot;If anyone schemes and kills someone deliberately,&quot; that person shall be &quot;put to death.&quot; I would have had no problem with late-term abortionist George Tiller being sentenced to death by a jury of his peers for committing thousands of murders of preborn children. In recent days both President Obama and his spokesman, Robert Gibbs, have endorsed the execution of alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. KSM&apos;s actions were no more heinous than GT&apos;s. But I did have a problem with Scott Roeder murdering Tiller. It was a premeditated, uncivil act. A pocket of pro-lifers think killing abortionists is just because it stops them from murdering
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Justice Alito to Obama:  &quot;not true&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2010/01/justice_alito_t.php" />
<modified>2010-01-28T13:14:24Z</modified>
<issued>2010-01-28T04:28:22Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.prolifeblogs.com,2010:/articles/2.5378</id>
<created>2010-01-28T04:28:22Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"> During his State of the Union Address, President Obama asserted: With all due deference to separation of powers, last week the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that, I believe, will open the floodgates for special interests, including...</summary>
<author>
<name>plb</name>
<url>http://www.twitter.com/prolifeblogs</url>
<email>prolifeblogs@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Commentary</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/">
<![CDATA[ During his State of the Union Address, President Obama asserted: With all due deference to separation of powers, last week the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that, I believe, will open the floodgates for special interests, including foreign corporations, to spend without limit in our elections. Justice Alito can be seen on the left, shaking his head and mouthing what appears to be "not true." Perhaps Obama's cheap shot at the High Court is rooted in the same concern expressed by pro-abortion radicals. &nbsp;Jay Anderson comments:This constitutional power play and effort at intimidation by Obama (with the full Court present at the SOTU speech) has to be about the most graceless and classless thing the man has done since taking office (although his&nbsp;mocking of the notion that morality might place some limits on scientific research during his speech announcing that he would fund ESCR&nbsp;ranks right up there).Read]]>
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>President Obama&apos;s first State of the Union Address</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2010/01/president_obama_1.php" />
<modified>2010-01-28T04:19:59Z</modified>
<issued>2010-01-28T03:50:07Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.prolifeblogs.com,2010:/articles/2.5377</id>
<created>2010-01-28T03:50:07Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">At his first inaugural address, President Ronald Reagan discussed plainly the role of interventionist government economic policies on the woes of that time: In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. From...</summary>
<author>
<name>plb</name>
<url>http://www.twitter.com/prolifeblogs</url>
<email>prolifeblogs@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Commentary</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/">
<![CDATA[At his first inaugural address, President Ronald Reagan discussed plainly the role of interventionist government economic policies on the woes of that time: In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. From time to time we've been tempted to believe that society has become too complex to be managed by self-rule, that government by an elite group is superior to government for, by, and of the people. Well, if no one among us is capable of governing himself, then who among us has the capacity to govern someone else? All of us together, in and out of government, must bear the burden. President Obama has a different philosophy, one that asserts the federal government as the savior through social engineering, control of the means of production, a welfare state and centralized healthcare. I appreciated the Family Research Council's&nbsp;quick&nbsp;response&nbsp;to Obama's proposed socialized child]]>
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Media Malpractice-March for Life</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2010/01/media_malpracti.php" />
<modified>2010-01-28T02:43:35Z</modified>
<issued>2010-01-28T02:46:46Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.prolifeblogs.com,2010:/articles/2.5375</id>
<created>2010-01-28T02:46:46Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">At the 2010 March for Life the media set new standards for journalistic fraud. In its lead photo, CNN showed five pro-abortion picketers, all that could be found, and ignored the 300,000 pro-life marchers. CNN&apos;s Rick Sanchez wondered out loud...</summary>
<author>
<name>anonymous</name>
<url>http://www.prolifeblogs.com</url>
<email>prolifeblogs@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Abortion</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/">
At the 2010 March for Life the media set new standards for journalistic fraud. In its lead photo, CNN showed five pro-abortion picketers, all that could be found, and ignored the 300,000 pro-life marchers. CNN&apos;s Rick Sanchez wondered out loud which group dominated. Newsweek claimed that most participants were in their 60&apos;s when, in fact, most were under 25. This video sets the record straight.
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>New Stanek WND column, &quot;Bill protects preborns after 20 weeks&quot;</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2010/01/new_stanek_wnd_114.php" />
<modified>2010-01-27T15:10:32Z</modified>
<issued>2010-01-27T15:02:00Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.prolifeblogs.com,2010:/articles/2.5376</id>
<created>2010-01-27T15:02:00Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"> On Dec. 3, 2009, NE late-term abortionist LeRoy Carhart told the New York Times that after the death of colleague George Tiller in May he began committing abortions &quot;&apos;past 24 weeks.&quot;... The NYT added: Dr. Carhart&apos;s fee schedule lists...</summary>
<author>
<name>jill stanek</name>
<url>http://www.jillstanek.com/</url>
<email>jillstanek@comcast.net</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/">
 On Dec. 3, 2009, NE late-term abortionist LeRoy Carhart told the New York Times that after the death of colleague George Tiller in May he began committing abortions &quot;&apos;past 24 weeks.&quot;... The NYT added: Dr. Carhart&apos;s fee schedule lists prices for abortions up to 22 weeks and 6 days (at that point, $2,100 in cash or $2,163 on a credit card), but notes that abortions after 23 weeks are available &quot;after consultation with our doctor,&quot; and that abortions after the 27th week may take four days. The problem is NE has a law banning abortions past the age of viability. Although unspecified, currently a baby is considered viable at 23 weeks. This wasn&apos;t the first time Carhart publicly flouted the fact he allows himself a wide swath of wiggle room on whether a baby he is aborting is viable or not. Hence the introduction of the Abortion Pain Prevention
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>The Terri Schiavo Life &amp; Hope Concert</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2010/01/the_terri_schia_1.php" />
<modified>2010-01-24T03:16:59Z</modified>
<issued>2010-01-24T03:09:04Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.prolifeblogs.com,2010:/articles/2.5367</id>
<created>2010-01-24T03:09:04Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Friends, many of you were with us during the battle for Terri Schindler Schiavo&apos;s life five years ago. We&apos;re delighted that the foundation established in her name continues to the good work and will commemorate her death with a &quot;Life...</summary>
<author>
<name>plb</name>
<url>http://www.twitter.com/prolifeblogs</url>
<email>prolifeblogs@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Terri Schiavo</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/">
<![CDATA[Friends, many of you were with us during the battle for Terri Schindler Schiavo's life five years ago. We're delighted that the foundation established in her name continues to the good work and will commemorate her death with a "Life and Hope" concert: Country Legend Randy Travis Headlines the April 11 show in Indianapolis with Opening Act Collin Raye&nbsp; The Terri Schindler Schiavo Foundation is excited to announce the first annual Terri Schiavo Life &amp; Hope Concert to be held at the Murat Theatre in Indianapolis, Indiana. This concert showcases two award-winning Country stars in a rare appearance together on the same stage! It promises to be a fabulous music show, long to be remembered by country music fans! The concert comes just days after the fifth anniversary of Terri Schiavo's death and will benefit the Foundation established by her family. With one of the most recognizable voices in country]]>
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>March for Life 2010</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2010/01/march_for_life_20.php" />
<modified>2010-01-23T21:14:28Z</modified>
<issued>2010-01-22T23:14:40Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.prolifeblogs.com,2010:/articles/2.5364</id>
<created>2010-01-22T23:14:40Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Participants in the 2010 March for Life were consistent in their reports of the crowd enthusiasm and size. HUGE. That is all I can say. The largest in recent memory. Some informal estimates at 300,000. In my humble opinion, there...</summary>
<author>
<name>plb</name>
<url>http://www.twitter.com/prolifeblogs</url>
<email>prolifeblogs@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Abortion</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/">
Participants in the 2010 March for Life were consistent in their reports of the crowd enthusiasm and size. HUGE. That is all I can say. The largest in recent memory. Some informal estimates at 300,000. In my humble opinion, there were more like 500,000 people attending the March. Pro-lifers swarmed Washington D.C. on a cool but rain free day. The sun even came out at the end of the day while the women from Silent No More gave their testimony. - Jakubczyk on Life Blogger Matt Cassens describes his first experience at the March: Today, in spite of the weather, I drove to Washington D.C. to partake in the 37th annual March For Life and had an experience like no other. I saw an enthusiastic crowd in very large numbers totally devoted to the life cause, consisting largely of young, fresh faced people chanting, praying, laughing, and enjoying life to
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Blogs for Life Live Video Feed</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2010/01/blogs_for_life_3.php" />
<modified>2010-01-21T03:11:35Z</modified>
<issued>2010-01-22T13:09:45Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.prolifeblogs.com,2010:/articles/2.5356</id>
<created>2010-01-22T13:09:45Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"></summary>
<author>
<name>plb</name>
<url>http://www.twitter.com/prolifeblogs</url>
<email>prolifeblogs@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Blogs4Life</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/">

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Blogs for Life is this Friday!!!! (updated)</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2010/01/blogs_for_life_4.php" />
<modified>2010-01-21T13:27:24Z</modified>
<issued>2010-01-21T03:12:37Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.prolifeblogs.com,2010:/articles/2.5357</id>
<created>2010-01-21T03:12:37Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"><![CDATA[he 5th annual&nbsp;Blogs for Life Conference&nbsp;will be this Friday from 8:30 to 11:30a EST, hosted by&nbsp;Family Research Council.You can&nbsp;still register&nbsp;to attend in person. Or make plans to view online. Bloggers can live stream the conference on their sites. Get the...]]></summary>
<author>
<name>plb</name>
<url>http://www.twitter.com/prolifeblogs</url>
<email>prolifeblogs@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Blogs4Life</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/">
<![CDATA[he 5th annual&nbsp;Blogs for Life Conference&nbsp;will be this Friday from 8:30 to 11:30a EST, hosted by&nbsp;Family Research Council.You can&nbsp;still register&nbsp;to attend in person. Or make plans to view online. Bloggers can live stream the conference on their sites. Get the embed code&nbsp;here.Here is the tentative speakers' schedule, which even as late as yesterday changed. So it's by no means written in stone.8:30 - 8:35a&nbsp;Jill Stanek, emcee introduction8:35 - 8:45a&nbsp;Kristen Day,&nbsp;Democrats for Life8:45 - 9:05a&nbsp;Joseph Farah,&nbsp;WorldNetDaily.com9:05 - 9:20a PANEL: "Hosting a winning pro-life blog, "&nbsp;American Life League's&nbsp;Katie Walker&nbsp;and ALL's&nbsp;Pro-life Blog Contest winners9:20 - 9:33a&nbsp;Carol Clews, Executive Director,Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Baltimore, MD9:33 - 9:35a&nbsp;Kristin Hansen, VP of Communications,&nbsp;Care Net9:35 - 9:45a&nbsp;Marjorie Dannenfelser, President,Susan B. Anthony List9:45 - 10:05a Rep. Todd Akin, R-MO10:05 - 10:15a Break10:15 - 10:25a&nbsp;Charmaine Yoest, Ph.D, President and CEO,&nbsp;Americans United for Life10:25 - 10:45a Rep.&nbsp;Jim Jordan, R-OH10:45 - 11:05a PANEL: Emerging Online Technologies,&nbsp;Molotov Mitchell,Illuminati Pictures;&nbsp;Peter Shinn, President,&nbsp;Pro-Life Unity;]]>
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Tulsa March for Life</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2010/01/tulsa_march_for.php" />
<modified>2010-01-21T03:33:38Z</modified>
<issued>2010-01-20T16:42:25Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.prolifeblogs.com,2010:/articles/2.5353</id>
<created>2010-01-20T16:42:25Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">A coalition of local churches, including the Roman Catholic Diocese of Tulsa, are sponsoring a march for life on Friday, January 22, 2010 at 6:30 p.m. The purpose of the march is to celebrate life on the anniversary of Roe...</summary>
<author>
<name>anonymous</name>
<url>http://www.prolifeblogs.com</url>
<email>prolifeblogs@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Announcements</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/">
A coalition of local churches, including the Roman Catholic Diocese of Tulsa, are sponsoring a march for life on Friday, January 22, 2010 at 6:30 p.m. The purpose of the march is to celebrate life on the anniversary of Roe v. Wade and to show solidarity with those marching in Washington, D.C. The march starts at 8th and Boulder.
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Massachusetts Voters Reject Obamacare</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2010/01/massachusetts_v.php" />
<modified>2010-01-20T03:24:12Z</modified>
<issued>2010-01-20T02:41:06Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.prolifeblogs.com,2010:/articles/2.5352</id>
<created>2010-01-20T02:41:06Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"><![CDATA[In a stunning upset, Republican Scott Brown defeated Democrat Martha Coakley in Massachsetts' Senate Race (53-47%). YES! &nbsp;Earlier in the race, Coakley led by over fifteen points and was expected to be a shoe-in. In fact, exit polls were not...]]></summary>
<author>
<name>plb</name>
<url>http://www.twitter.com/prolifeblogs</url>
<email>prolifeblogs@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Politics</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/">
<![CDATA[In a stunning upset, Republican Scott Brown defeated Democrat Martha Coakley in Massachsetts' Senate Race (53-47%). YES! &nbsp;Earlier in the race, Coakley led by over fifteen points and was expected to be a shoe-in. In fact, exit polls were not even planned for what was considered a sure Democratic victory. Having spoiled the Democratic super majority needed to pass Obamacare, Brown now fills the seat vacated by the passing of Sen. Edward Kennedy. There are more long faces at MSNBC than at an aardvark convention - Michelle Malkin We wish Brown's victory had been about Obamacare's abortion provision. It wasn't. Massachusetts chose Brown to protect their pocket books, lower taxes and protect their families from the Senate's healthcare debacle. &nbsp;Fiscal responsibility is to be desired and a cornerstone of Brown's campaign was his promise to vote against Obama's healthcare plan.Update: &nbsp;Democrats are scrambling to blame someone for conducting a poor]]>
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Election Results:  Coakley vs Brown - Update:  Brown Wins!</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2010/01/election_result.php" />
<modified>2010-01-20T02:34:02Z</modified>
<issued>2010-01-20T01:31:39Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.prolifeblogs.com,2010:/articles/2.5350</id>
<created>2010-01-20T01:31:39Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"><![CDATA[Final Update (9:25 EST): Brown has won the election (see results below). &nbsp;(Boston Globe website crashed - as has HotAir and Michelle Malkin) Massachusetts polls are closed and results are coming in fast and furious. At 8:40 EST with only...]]></summary>
<author>
<name>plb</name>
<url>http://www.twitter.com/prolifeblogs</url>
<email>prolifeblogs@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Politics</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/">
<![CDATA[Final Update (9:25 EST): Brown has won the election (see results below). &nbsp;(Boston Globe website crashed - as has HotAir and Michelle Malkin) Massachusetts polls are closed and results are coming in fast and furious. At 8:40 EST with only 17% of districts reporting Brown leads Coakley 52% to 47%. One blogger notes: On CNN, live shots of the respective campaign headquarters showed Brown's HQ in a state of euphoria -- and Coakley's HQ dead as a funeral. Meanwhile, the Boston Globe (accidentally) called the race for Coakley (oops). If Brown does indeed win, despite his opposition to Obamacare and emphasis on fiscal responsibility, Republicans are going to have to get use to the idea that he is neither a conservative or pro-life. Updates (8:47 EST): Brown maintains same lead with 36% of precincts reporting. (8:53 EST): Brown maintains 52% to 47% lead with 45% of precincts reporting. (8:57 EST):]]>
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Brown and Coakley</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2010/01/brown_and_coakl.php" />
<modified>2010-01-19T05:40:16Z</modified>
<issued>2010-01-19T05:12:32Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.prolifeblogs.com,2010:/articles/2.5347</id>
<created>2010-01-19T05:12:32Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"><![CDATA[A few descriptive terms:Freefall&nbsp;- A new InsiderAdvantage poll conducted exclusively for POLITICO shows Republican Scott Brown holding a 9-point advantage over Martha Coakley a day before Massachusetts voters trek to the ballot box to choose a new senator. (Politico)A Perfect...]]></summary>
<author>
<name>plb</name>
<url>http://www.twitter.com/prolifeblogs</url>
<email>prolifeblogs@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Politics</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/">
<![CDATA[A few descriptive terms:Freefall&nbsp;- A new InsiderAdvantage poll conducted exclusively for POLITICO shows Republican Scott Brown holding a 9-point advantage over Martha Coakley a day before Massachusetts voters trek to the ballot box to choose a new senator. (Politico)A Perfect Storm - But while Brown doggedly ran like he could win, he benefited greatly from Coakley running like she already had. And he has benefited tremendously from the same storm, blowing at his back, that is now blowing in her face. It's a perfect storm. Coakley might yet weather it. But it is starting to look a lot like a torrential rain on her parade. (Jules Crittenden) A Coup&nbsp;- If Brown pulls off this coup, expect a total "mainstream" media meltdown Tuesday night as results come in. I wouldn't be surprised to see multiple and widespread pronouncements like we've already seen from David Schuster that the voters have lost their]]>
</content>
</entry>

</feed>