I don't honestly know how one can "support" a President who is so against defending human life from the moment of conception, especially when it is the "inalienable Right to life", the first one in the Declaration, that he is most intent on dismantling for everyone in this country.
How can that be called the trait of a truly "good" man when he alienates that right for those who have been scientifically considered   human beings for a very long time?
Without life, none of the rest of what he does or doesn't do even has a chance to make a difference.
Obama clearly doesn't represent me and millions more Americans (what was it, 46 million of us).
And thus I find it ironic that many folks expect us to "support" Obama just because he's the President, when the vast majority, if not all, of those folks RAILED AGAINST (umm, DIDN'T support) Bush when he was President.
Isn't it interesting that they expect us to do what they refused to do?
(Get your daily Mallard Fillmore fix here)
Here are a few informative places to start reading (the links within these posts, particularly) for those who are not fully aware of what Obama really stands for, as evidenced by some of the comments on this blog.


Recent Comments
Veeja: "Come What May is not impressive. Not only ..."
Fiona: "Yes, I agree that anyone pro-life should be ..."
Pro-life atheist: "Steve, if it makes you feel any better, ..."
Jayme: "This is a free country, and everyone is ..."
Ronald Johnson: "Yes they should. There are children being murdered ..."
Bekah Ferguson: "Steve Sanborn, you should note that in my ..."
Steve Sanborn: "Bekah, Sinless? It's obvious that I do not ..."