Whenever I see people who support abortion with the blood-thirsty ferocity of hyena, Ronald Reagan's words come to mind: "Abortion is advocated only by persons who have themselves been born."
Every pro-choicer has had the blessing of being allowed to live through their mothers' pregnancy. The truth is that no one would like to be treated the way pro-choicers treat babies. Fetuses are even lucky if they're granted the description, "human". These people have been tortured by brutal execution methods and liberals celebrate their death as a woman's right...
Some pro abortion supporters even say that it's merciful to kill one's disabled baby because the earth is a terrible place to live, and the baby will suffer. (Sigh.) Is there one human on Earth that has not at some point suffered? In fact, I bet many pro-abortion people are suffering. Why should we not be merciful to them and abort them if they are so insistent on keeping people from suffering?
Also, if liberals really cared about the earth being over populated, why do they not sacrifice themselves so that some of these innocent pre-born babies can have life and the earth won't be crowded? After all, Jesus said, "The greatest love a person can show is to lay down one's life for a friend." If liberals really cared about the earth and about other people, they would be the first to sacrifice themselves for the earth to have room and babies to have life. But, of course liberals don't care about that. Liberalism is the most self-serving political party system to have ever existed. They say they're afraid the earth will run out of room.. So what do they do? Let's kill babies so they don't crowd the earth!
No pro-abortion supporter would be willing to be treated the way they advocate for unborn babies to be treated. In their gut, liberals know pre-borns are human. Of course age doesn't make someone more or less human. Yet, to justify their hypocritical stance, liberals have to lie about the "personhood" of infants....
Read this article in its entirety here.
Hypocrisy is a consequence of abortion and not really relevant to the core question which is, who is guilty of an act that objectively is nothing less than murder? We have legalized, and moralized, the barbarian act of spilling the blood of our own children. The women, who have abortions, are primarily guilty of falling prey to the convoluted pressures, and the contrived deception, preached by our elitist leaders following the 1973 Supreme Court Roe v. Wade, and Doe v. Bolton decisions. These women, for the most part, are inculpable. Subjectively, full guilt for the grave matter of abortion requires full knowledge, and the full consent of the will. Consequently, our whole society must accept the guilty of our social suicide.
There are good, moral, intelligent people on both sides of the abortion debate; it becomes a question of who is correct? Humility could help us find our way; it’s the virtue by which we acknowledge our own limitations and imperfections. We may believe we are correct but Plato argued that belief is a product of persuasion. The reasoning that produces knowledge also produces truth; and knowledge is understood to mean truth. Belief, however, can be true or it can be false. It is like the evidence produced in a court of law, where persuasion leads to a belief that a person is innocent beyond a reasonable doubt, even though one does not “know” it in a factual or scientific way.
Common sense tells us it’s not logical or humane to terminate human life even if we have been persuaded, and believe, that it does not have equal rights; we have to demonstrate scientifically that our belief is also true! The burden of that proof is on those who support the destruction of a preborn fetus. Pro-life groups believe that the fetus has full and equal human rights when they have been launched into the essence of humanity; the zygote is a member of the human family, and should be protected by our Constitution like any person, in any other stage of life.
We live in a materialistic age that insists on immediate gratification; we want to have what we currently believe will make living more convenient, and pleasurable. If what we want is intellectually, socially repugnant, like the killing of a human life, we resort to doublespeak to obscure the reality of the evil we do. The 1973 Supreme Court drew on the “partly lighted area surrounding the complete darkness of a concept” (a penumbra) to confound us into accepting their radical judicial activism. By the subtle changes in the interpretation of facts, we have harden our hearts, first to reluctantly tolerating abortion, then to its acceptance, and finally to its full embrace. The Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton decisions have made us a nation of barbarians. Writers for Life