DearMSNBC HOST> Mr. Matthews,

Pro-life activists are not terrorists.

To equate individuals and groups who fight for the right to life of our most defenseless citizens with terrorists is regrettable. I hope you refrain from doing so in the future.

We in the pro-life community stand against the Sebelius nomination because she has shown herself to be radically opposed to any check on abortion.

It is our right and our duty to speak out against this nomination.
We await your apology.

We are working with representative's in Congress. The United States Senate signed correspondence brought to the attention of President Barack H. Obama.

They write because there is grave concern in regards to HHS (Dept. Health & Human Services) rescinding the January 2009 rule clarifying conscience protections for Americans serving in the health care field. Let us be clear, this regulation is not about whether or not abortion should or should not be allowed in America. This regulation is about whether we will respect the deeply HELD MORAL CONVICTIONS of those who dedicated their lives to protecting the life and the health of others.

Hospital chart's contain information on said "patient's" never is an "infant" not a patient and the doctor's chart does NOT discriminate against said "patient" by calling the "infant" a "choice."

Chris Mathews shame on you, I liked you better when you said, "this guy is representing Obama, and he can't give me one "legislative accomplishment" of then Senator Barack H. Obama.

Chris Mathews you ask for women's right to be so sweeping to carry through to the birth of a child?- isn't MSNBC following the case
on Dr. Tiller?

Clinton appointee, US Justice Phyllis Hamilton reasoned against BAN on Partial Birth Abortion: reasoning? "women's choice is paramount and the unborn's pain is irrelevant" Senate voted: 61-38 for the fetal rights bill aka "Unborn victim's of violence protection act" there is also other passed pro-life legislation to review and no sweeping "strong arm" approach can ignore it.
This process is PRO-LIFE "legislative accomplishment's."

Who is overreaching?
walking over (above) established law?

Listen Chris, you support "human embryonic stem cell research," and Senator Mike Huckabee keeps a picture of a little girl (five years old) to be exact, this picture is kept in his wallet, reminds him that she was once a frozen embryo in the fertility clinic.

And you know, Michael J. Fox in the fiction movie,back to the future? FOX also is holding in his hands that very picture of that little girl in Mike Huckabee's wallet, picture is dissolving by "CHANGE" an intrusion on that person's fate.

Adult stem cell research, amongst other journaled medical evidence(see below)has proven to be ethical and viable.

"Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation"
President Ronald Reagan
copyright 1983. >>>>>>>>>

The House, Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J.) led a Special Order on Wednesday night in which he and nine other pro-life members--Reps. Zach Wamp (R-Tenn.), Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.), Jeff Fortenberry (R-Neb.), Randy Forbes (R-Va.), Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), John Fleming (R-La.), Gus Bilirakis (R-Fla.), Michele Bachmann (R-Minn), and Mark Souder(R-Ind.)--hailed the latest adult stem cell successes and breakthroughs in getting embryonic--like stem cells without using human embryos. Even today we learned of researchers who have turned ethically created cells into the neurons that break down in Parkinson's disease. This follows news of successful treatment of a Parkinson's patient with his own adult stem cells. As these members argued, stem cell advances have moved beyond the embryonic stem cell debate. Congress should support positive legislation such as the Forbes/Lipinski Patients First Act rather than go along with the Obama Administration in funding the unethical and ineffective research on embryos. >>>>>>>>

Additional Resources
YouTube: Pro Life Information

mroberts | March 14, 2009 1:04 PM

This is a really disturbing one for me, and it has been pushed at the federal level as well. A bill passed in Congress last year enacted a "voluntary" program where hospitals would take DNA from babies when they were born, whether or not the parents wished for that to happen. The program did not actually require hospitals to do this, but it did tie funding to the "request". I don't know about you, but the government does not own our bodies, and does not have the right to take DNA and use if for scientific research down the line. This kind of garbage really gets me angry.

http://www.cfcamerica.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=513:when-you-have-a-baby-the-government-is-collecting-and-documenting-your-babys-dna-in-an-online-database&catid=3:news&Itemid=96

Disclaimer: The statements and articles listed here, and any opinions, are those of the writers alone, and neither are opinions of nor reflect the views of ProLifeBlogs. Aggregated content created by others is the sole responsibility of the writers and its accuracy and completeness are not endorsed or guaranteed. This goes for all those links, too: ProLifeBlogs has no control over the information you access via such links, does not endorse that information, cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided or any analysis based thereon, and shall not be responsible for it or for the consequences of your use of that information.

Forced DNA Extraction Has Begun

Categories:

Tags:

2 Comments

Recent Entries

Categories

Pro-Life Articles