The Marketing Of Abortion

| 12 Comments

Marketing plays a tremendous role in our society concerning most issues and events. For example, Barack Obama's campaign, along with the mainstream media's cooperation, basically got him elected because of a slick style-over-substance marketing plan. His daily pounding of the ideas of hope and change, without being questioned about specifics or an examination of his past, created a nice little marketing package. We also have had many other marketing campaigns that have been quite effective, such as anti-smoking, anti-fatty foods and global warming.

The pro-abortion view has also been based mainly on the marketing of "choice." America's society was founded on freedom of choice. For example, one chooses which school to attend, what career path to take, where to live, who to marry, etc. It's a natural extension to make choice in abortion an acceptable idea. In fact, it's a brilliant marketing ploy. Consequently, when someone questions them and states that they are really pro-abortion, their comeback is that they aren't pro-abortion, but abortion should be a choice to be considered. Obviously, if they believe abortion is an option, then they are pro-abortion. Planned Parenthood masks their main function of abortion by often saying they are for women's health issues or birth control.

The pro-abortion crowd also uses another common term that is difficult to question. The use of "right" is another word and idea that is ingrained in our society. Of course, our founders said that we have a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Obviously, the right to life has been conveniently excluded when the pro-abortion group discusses abortion. The woman's right to choose and right to control her own body are examples of their marketing strategy. Also, if you are against a woman's right to choose, then you might be labeled anti-woman. By creating this marketing approach, they have made it very difficult to oppose their view without being labeled negatively.

The pro-life movement needs a strong marketing campaign of its own to counteract this. The terms "pro-life" and "sanctity of life" often are seen by the masses as terms to defend the position, just as the pro-abortion people use terms to justify their view. Thus, many view that there are just two opposite views without one being the absolute correct one.

We often have been sugar coating the truth of abortion, by avoiding showing or telling the truth of what happens during an abortion. The pro-life marketing approach should be one of distributing or showing as many videos as possible, such as the short video Harder Truth or others that show abortions. Currently, technology has advanced so far that it is fairly easy to disperse photos and videos that could greatly help promote the message. Hopefully, at some point there could be a documentary on a major television network really showing the truth about abortion. The pro-abortion movement would undoubtedly retort with the same old marketing campaign in rebuttal to this. But the images of abortions will assuredly never leave the collective memories of all who see them. We will move ahead in the marketing battle and one step closer to eliminating abortion.

12 Comments

On Dec 5 the Supreme Court will either allow or disallow the usurpation of both the Constitution and the Government of the United States — easily the most pivotal decision since our nation’s founding — and the silence of the news media is deafening (if not downright scary).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqH7rSHcvgU

The biggest marketing ploy we can use is to tear down the pro-abort's marketing campaign. Show the "pro-choice" appeal for the lie that it is. Every time the pro-aborts try to stop legislation to prevent coerced or forced abortion, jump up and scream how they are campaigning against a woman's right to choose--to give birth.

When women are murdered for refusing to have an abortion, and the silence from the local pro-aborts is deafeningly loud, point this out equally loudly. Ask the abortion industry and the local feminists why they are not defending the right to choice for the woman who wants to give birth. Why are they not expressing outrage over her murder? After all, she was just exercising her right to choose. Don't they want people to make such choices in safety? Then compare their responses to such killings to the way they respond when a woman is inconvenienced with a 24 hour waiting period. Why are pro-abortion feminists silent about women killed by their baby's father for refusing abortion, but march in the streets in outrage over the inconvenience of the waiting period? Put that on the evening news, if you dare.

When the so-called defenders of women's rights claim that women must be allowed to control their own bodies, but these same people don't want any extra punishment for assaults on pregnant women that hurt or kill wanted fetuses, you have to wonder how concerned they are about letting women control their bodies. Do they really want to let women control their own bodies? Sure they do, yeah right. As long as she doesn't control it all the way to live childbirth.

Did you know that once a woman enters an abortion clinic to have an abortion, she has no right to change her mind about it? If she tries, there are many clinics that will have none of it. If she tries to leave before the abortion is done, some clinics will gather the clinic staff around to hold her down so that the abortion can continue. There have even been cases of clinic staff chasing a girl or woman out of the clinic and after catching her, dragging her back into the clinic, and holding her down, or injecting a drug into her, to stop her resistance so that the abortion can be done. Where is the right to choose for these women? And where is the feminist outrage about the violation of her right to choose.

In order for a woman to really have the right to choose, her right not to abort must be at least as strongly protected as her right to abort. Thus she must be protected against pressure to abort when she doesn't want to. She must be protected from being penalized for not aborting. Jobs, housing, and other services must never be dependent on her willingness to abort. Violence against pregnant women must be punished with the strictest severity, especially if the violence is to prevent the birth of the baby, or to punish the mother for refusing to abort.

Women who enter abortion clinics must not be forced to leave their right to choose at the clinic door. This means they have the right to change their minds, and walk out of the clinic still pregnant. The staff must not have the right to do anything about it. Any clinic staff who stops her from leaving should be charged with false imprisonment. If they chase her out the door and drag her back, that is kidnapping.

Injecting her with drugs or having a group of workers hold her down could be an assault charge. So could forcing her legs apart and sticking something up her vagina against her will. Wooaah, what did I just say? That sentence sounds suspiciously like rape, even though such forcing would be necessary to complete the abortion. Am I giving you ideas on how we could use the mantra of choice against the pro-aborts?

Anyway, you get the idea of how we could use some of the abortion industries more extreme practices to disprove their claim that they are for choice, or that they care about the rights of women.

Just an aside, in all other medical procedures, patients have the right to refuse. My doctors don't even have the right to weigh me if I don't want them to. So why should abortionists get special rights to force someone who has changed their minds?

Excellent points.

One of the saddest situations is when very young girls or women are forced to have an abortion by a parent or a boyfriend.

Not that other abortions are less sad.

CeeCee
Where did you get your facts? Never heard of that women were forced to have an abortion. please tell me where this occured.There could be some cases where someone could force an abortion but i don't think this is the practice of the clinics you mentioned . Give me some statistics with source of your facts.
kit

In the US, abortions are frequently forced only in the sense that women are abandoned by family and left on their own. Pregnancy counseling centers try to fill some of those needs. Democrats keep trying to close them down.

A couple of years ago Katelyn Kamp was kidnapped by her parents. She escaped before they arrived at the abortuary. They later pleaded guilty to lesser charges.

Had her parents kidnapped her to stop her from killing their grandchild, they would be in prison for a very long time.

http://www.lifenews.com/state2663.html

I can verify
that women are often coerced, threatened, and forced to have abortions. And some don't get to change their minds once inside the clinic.

You don't hear about it in the news media that has protected abortionists for 40 years now.

Get a copy of Lime Five by Life Dynamics. Read for yourself.

Well Kit, check out the sixth response here and you will find a place to look for the answers you seek. You can also go to a search engine and type in "forced abortion" or "coerced abortion." There are a lot of answers there for you. I think you will find the information shocking.

Well Kit, check out the sixth response here and you will find a place to look for the answers you seek. You can also go to a search engine and type in "forced abortion" or "coerced abortion." There are a lot of answers there for you. I think you will find the information shocking.

If you surf the web for forced or coerced abortions, you will find many horror stories, and not all of them take place in China. Some of them take place right here in the U. S. Maybe from your town.

It's time to show the pro-aborts that if they want "choice," then they have to accept that choice goes two ways. It can also be used to avoid abortion. If they want to use the word choice to get people to support abortion rights, then they have to stop being hypocrites and stop campaigning against a woman's right to choose life.

There have even been cases of clinic staff chasing a girl or woman out of the clinic and after catching her, dragging her back into the clinic, and holding her down, or injecting a drug into her, to stop her resistance so that the abortion can be done.

Really? Name/date/location? Phsycially forced medical procedures happen all the time?
You can't debate something using lies as facts.

Hey Nobody
Where did this happen? Were the police notified? It's hard to believe that the clinic got away with this. What is the point of bringing this up. Are trying to prove something?

Kit and nobody, did it ever occur to you to do some research and take the advice given you?

Lime 5. A book. Published in 1996 so it won't include all the horror but true stories since then. You can get it on Amazon, if you dare. I have it. Its sole sources are "lawsuits, police records, newspapers articles, death certificates, autopsies, medical examiners' reports, state licensing board documents, articles in peer-reviewed medical journals" and firsthand accounts. NOTHING is made up.

The book also cites 25 pages of footnotes in small print, 381 of them in Chaps. 1 and 4 (a total of 738) from which it quotes major papers’ articles like Chicago Sun-Times, NYT, Chicago Tribune, Houston Chronicle, Miami Herald, and documents from courts like the NY, Maryland, San Diego and various US District Courts of Appeals.

For the FORCED ABORTION LINKS, I'll put those in the next comment):

It isn't for the faint of stomach or heart.

Here's more truth you don't and won't want to know:

Graphic Case Histories: Injuries to the Uterus, Cervix, Intestines; Retained Fetal Tissue etc. On only 21 pages, the book details 24 maternal deaths as late as 1994. Chapter 1 goes on for 40 more pages. The book documents over 700 publicly-available instances from legal abortion: of maternal death, injury, disease-contraction, rape by abortionists, abortions done on non-pregnant women, failed abortion (baby survives but is left to die since no laws required babies to be saved), and more, in 22 years of legalized abortion.

Its title is the code name given to a woman who suffered medical complications from a botched abortion.

It isn't lies. It is all fact. YOU can't debate something when you refuse to go to the source you are told to go to.

Here are some excerpts if you can't bother getting the book:

• The Colorado Board of Medical Examiners has ruled that an abortionist who knowingly sent a woman home from his clinic with a retained fetal skull did not deviate from the acceptable standard of care, since other Colorado abortionists testified that they frequently do the same thing. The same body ruled that performing abortions on women who aren't pregnant is also within the "minimum standard of care."

• In 1985, "Dawn," a 13-year-old girl, was mortally injured during a botched abortion at a New York County abortion clinic. Crutcher recalls: "Because Dawn was given only half the dose of anesthesia necessary for the operation, she awoke five minutes into the procedure. When she began to vomit and choke, [the abortionist] inserted a breathing tube. He continued with the abortion, although he failed to extract the remainder of the fetus, and left Dawn unattended in a recovery room. Dawn then suffered a heart attack and slipped into a coma."

The law did not require parental notification, and the abortion was paid for by Dawn's 15- year-old boyfriend. Accordingly, it was not until Dawn was fighting for her life in a hospital ward that her parents learned of what had happened. She died after three weeks in a coma. Her death did not unduly disturb the abortionist, who later informed a judge: "I've done 13-year-olds before. When they're ten, maybe I'll notice."

• "In July 1979," Crutcher reports, "[abortionist] John Roe 279 attempted to abort a 23- week pregnancy after which the one-pound, two-ounce infant boy gasped and attempted to breathe. No efforts were made to revive the infant due to his parents' wishes and the infant's size. He was placed in a utility closet used as an infant morgue. Roe instructed a nurse, 'Leave the baby there -- it will die.' The nurse testified that the infant was still gasping in the closet when she returned to work 12 hours later. Roe then agreed to transfer the baby to a hospital, where he died four days later. The child's death was ruled accidental."

• "John Roe 109," a medical school washout from Texas, tried his hand at professional wrestling while waiting for a medical occupation fitted to his talents. Roe v. Wade provided him with just the right opportunity. While out of jail on appeal following a murder conviction for killing a baby which survived an abortion, "John Roe 109" performed a botched abortion which resulted in the death of a 28-year-old woman. Appropriately, this exemplar of modern women's "emancipation" has characterized Adolf Hitler as "one of the most misunderstood men in history. He was a really great man."

• In 1982, abortionist "John Roe 35" was convicted of kidnaping and raping a girl under the age of 13. He was also charged with indecent exposure, assault with intent to commit kidnaping, and the attempted rape of a minor as the result of a separate incident during which he loitered outside a high school and exposed himself to students. Several of the abortionists profiled in Lime 5 have been convicted of or charged with sexual assaults on minors.

• In 1989, a Florida newspaper ran an exposé of a particularly disreputable Miami abortion clinic. Its owner had a police record which included convictions for cocaine possession and hit-and-run driving. At one point, she received her paycheck from the clinic while she was in jail. Her brother, a clinic employee, was also sent to prison as an axe murderer. One of the clinic's abortionists had lost his license in another state for sexually molesting a 14-year-old.

It was not until one woman was killed at the clinic and several others were mutilated that the press took an interest in the facility and its staff. "And as always happens when the light finally shines on one of these places," Crutcher grimly notes, "local abortion advocates crawled out of the woodwork to reluctantly admit that they knew what was going on, but kept silent for political reasons."


There are more excerpts here: http://www.prolife.com/lime5.htm (these speak of other crimes against women involving their abortions, hope you're sitting down)

As for you, kit, with your taunting questions, "What is the point of bringing this up. Are trying to prove something?"

Yes, we are. The point of bringing it up is "what will you who support abortion DO about all these crimes?"

The prove-something part is the answer to that question that you and all abortion supporters have already given and continue to give: YOU DO NOTHING TO STOP IT or TO GET JUSTICE FOR IT.

You're afraid to believe it is true and you're afraid to do anything about it.

We are not. Because it is all true.

(CONTINUED)

PROOFS OF FORCED ABORTIONS:
We list links to 18 instances prior to 2005, read all about 'em here, http://afterabortion.blogspot.com/2005/02/women-forced-to-have-abortions-got.html

Here's a more recent one: http://archives.cnn.com/2000/US/08/02/forced.abortion.ap/index.html

or google these phrases in quote marks:

"Kidnap tied to forced abortion attempt" from 2006, in Maine

"Guangxi Officials Carry Out Mass Forced Abortions"

"Man Charged With Attempted Murder for Slipping Abortion Drug to Girlfriend to Cause Miscarriages"

"Man Convicted in Forced Abortion Attempt"

http://www.globalexchange.org/campaigns/sweatshops/saipan/abc040100.html

AS YOU CAN SEE, FOLKS, I COULD LIST HUNDREDS OF FACTS YOU HAVE NO CLUE ABOUT.

You know so little of the truth, about ANYTHING that has to do with abortion, and I've been researching all this for over 5 years now, posting the results of my research on those blogs and this one.

There is virtually nothing you can throw up against the wall that cannot be refuted, when it comes to the truths about abortion.

Yet you still defend it as though your lives depended on it.

Maybe they do.




button02b.gif

Categories

Archives

Pro-Life Articles

add your site
Reclaiming Our Children Jan 1, 1970, 7:00 am
Opinion Times Sep 23, 2017, 12:39 pm
Opinion Times Sep 23, 2017, 12:39 pm
Opinion Times Sep 23, 2017, 2:13 pm
Opinion Times Sep 23, 2017, 12:39 pm
Opinion Times Sep 23, 2017, 1:09 pm
Opinion Times Sep 23, 2017, 2:13 pm
Christian Musician...Pro Life! Sep 18, 2017, 12:02 pm
A Catholic Life Sep 23, 2017, 11:44 am
Opinion Times Sep 23, 2017, 7:02 am
Opinion Times Sep 23, 2017, 4:29 am
Opinion Times Sep 23, 2017, 2:55 am
Greater Fitchburg For Life Jan 1, 1970, 12:00 am
Greater Fitchburg For Life Sep 23, 2017, 4:20 am
DEACON FOR LIFE Jan 1, 1970, 12:00 am
DEACON FOR LIFE Sep 23, 2017, 3:15 am
Opinion Times Sep 23, 2017, 12:13 am
Opinion Times Sep 23, 2017, 12:13 am
Opinion Times Sep 23, 2017, 12:13 am
Opinion Times Sep 23, 2017, 12:13 am
Opinion Times Sep 23, 2017, 12:13 am
CNSNews.com Headlines Sep 22, 2017, 9:11 pm
Spero News Dec 31, 1969, 11:00 pm
BIG C CATHOLICS Sep 22, 2017, 10:39 pm
BIG C CATHOLICS Sep 22, 2017, 10:27 pm
Pro-Life Unity Jan 1, 1970, 12:00 am
Live Action Blog Sep 22, 2017, 9:27 pm
LifeNews Sep 22, 2017, 10:03 pm
LifeNews Sep 22, 2017, 9:50 pm
BIG C CATHOLICS Sep 22, 2017, 9:22 pm
Rebelution Sep 22, 2017, 8:49 pm
Opinion Times Sep 22, 2017, 9:12 pm
Opinion Times Sep 22, 2017, 9:12 pm
Opinion Times Sep 22, 2017, 9:12 pm
Opinion Times Sep 22, 2017, 9:12 pm
Opinion Times Sep 22, 2017, 9:12 pm
Opinion Times Sep 22, 2017, 9:17 pm
Live Action Blog Sep 22, 2017, 8:31 pm
Live Action Blog Sep 22, 2017, 4:41 pm
Live Action Blog Sep 22, 2017, 4:29 pm
Live Action Blog Sep 22, 2017, 8:51 pm
LifeNews Sep 22, 2017, 8:32 pm
CNSNews.com Headlines Sep 22, 2017, 7:35 pm
Christian Newswire: All Releases Sep 22, 2017, 10:38 pm
Christian Newswire: All Releases Sep 22, 2017, 10:39 pm
LifeNews Sep 22, 2017, 7:33 pm
LifeNews Sep 22, 2017, 7:56 pm
LifeNews Sep 22, 2017, 7:45 pm
BIG C CATHOLICS Sep 22, 2017, 6:00 pm
BIG C CATHOLICS Sep 22, 2017, 6:05 pm
Opinion Times Sep 22, 2017, 7:14 pm
Opinion Times Sep 22, 2017, 6:32 pm
NoisyRoom.net Sep 22, 2017, 7:13 pm
LifeNews Sep 22, 2017, 7:15 pm
LifeNews Sep 22, 2017, 5:32 pm
LifeNews Sep 22, 2017, 5:57 pm
LifeNews Sep 22, 2017, 6:56 pm
CNSNews.com Headlines Sep 22, 2017, 6:06 pm
CNSNews.com Headlines Sep 22, 2017, 6:54 pm
CNSNews.com Headlines Sep 22, 2017, 6:21 pm
CNSNews.com Headlines Sep 22, 2017, 6:43 pm
Happy Catholic Jan 1, 1970, 12:00 am
CNSNews.com Headlines Sep 22, 2017, 6:00 pm
CNSNews.com Headlines Sep 22, 2017, 4:22 pm
Christian Newswire: All Releases Sep 20, 2017, 2:00 pm
Christian Newswire: All Releases Sep 20, 2017, 9:00 pm
Christian Newswire: All Releases Sep 20, 2017, 9:15 pm
Christian Newswire: All Releases Sep 20, 2017, 3:00 pm
Christian Newswire: All Releases Sep 20, 2017, 3:01 pm
Christian Newswire: All Releases Sep 19, 2017, 11:00 am
Christian Newswire: All Releases Sep 19, 2017, 5:59 pm
Christian Newswire: All Releases Sep 19, 2017, 4:33 pm
Christian Newswire: All Releases Sep 20, 2017, 11:00 am
Christian Newswire: All Releases Sep 19, 2017, 6:24 pm
Christian Newswire: All Releases Sep 21, 2017, 3:01 pm
Christian Newswire: All Releases Sep 21, 2017, 3:00 pm
Christian Newswire: All Releases Sep 21, 2017, 5:10 pm
Christian Newswire: All Releases Sep 22, 2017, 4:10 pm
Christian Newswire: All Releases Sep 21, 2017, 7:51 pm
Christian Newswire: All Releases Sep 22, 2017, 5:49 pm
Christian Newswire: All Releases Sep 21, 2017, 8:01 pm
Students for Life of Illinois Sep 18, 2017, 4:00 pm
Reclaiming Our Children Jan 1, 1970, 7:00 am
Opinion Times Sep 22, 2017, 3:12 pm
Live Action Blog Sep 22, 2017, 4:29 pm
Live Action Blog Sep 22, 2017, 4:41 pm
LifeNews Sep 22, 2017, 4:50 pm
Leaven for the Loaf Sep 22, 2017, 4:54 pm
March For Life Sep 22, 2017, 3:51 pm
LifeNews Sep 22, 2017, 3:31 pm
CNSNews.com Headlines Sep 22, 2017, 3:34 pm
Christian Newswire: All Releases Sep 22, 2017, 5:49 pm
Opinion Times Sep 22, 2017, 2:38 pm
LifeNews Sep 22, 2017, 3:01 pm
LifeNews Sep 22, 2017, 2:19 pm
The Ohio Anglican.blog Sep 22, 2017, 2:35 pm
The Ohio Anglican.blog Jan 1, 1970, 12:00 am
Opinion Times Sep 22, 2017, 1:07 pm
open book Jan 1, 1970, 4:00 am
Live Action Blog Sep 22, 2017, 2:07 pm
LifeNews Sep 22, 2017, 2:07 pm
EmpowerShop Prolife Sep 22, 2017, 1:20 pm
EmpowerShop Prolife Sep 22, 2017, 12:44 pm
EmpowerShop Prolife Sep 22, 2017, 1:00 pm
EmpowerShop Prolife Sep 22, 2017, 1:13 pm
EmpowerShop Prolife Sep 22, 2017, 1:08 pm
EmpowerShop Prolife Sep 22, 2017, 1:05 pm
EmpowerShop Prolife Sep 22, 2017, 1:04 pm
EmpowerShop Prolife Sep 22, 2017, 1:12 pm
EmpowerShop Prolife Sep 22, 2017, 12:57 pm
CNSNews.com Headlines Sep 22, 2017, 12:57 pm
CNSNews.com Headlines Sep 22, 2017, 1:26 pm
Christian Newswire: All Releases Sep 22, 2017, 4:10 pm
The Common Room Sep 22, 2017, 12:34 pm
LifeNews Sep 22, 2017, 12:59 pm
Opinion Times Sep 22, 2017, 11:34 am
CNSNews.com Headlines Sep 22, 2017, 10:19 am
CNSNews.com Headlines Sep 22, 2017, 11:20 am
CNSNews.com Headlines Sep 22, 2017, 11:43 am
BIG C CATHOLICS Sep 22, 2017, 11:45 am
CNSNews.com Headlines Sep 22, 2017, 9:47 am
Les Femmes - The Truth Sep 22, 2017, 10:00 am
Greater Fitchburg For Life Sep 22, 2017, 10:20 am
Greater Fitchburg For Life Jan 1, 1970, 12:00 am
Greater Fitchburg For Life Jan 1, 1970, 12:00 am
Greater Fitchburg For Life Jan 1, 1970, 12:00 am
Fundamentally Reformed Sep 22, 2017, 2:35 am
CNSNews.com Headlines Sep 22, 2017, 8:43 am
CNSNews.com Headlines Sep 22, 2017, 8:18 am
Catholic Church Conservation Sep 22, 2017, 9:15 am
CNSNews.com Headlines Sep 22, 2017, 4:41 am
Catholic Fire Sep 22, 2017, 5:26 am
Opinion Times Sep 22, 2017, 2:47 am
Opinion Times Sep 22, 2017, 2:16 am
Opinion Times Sep 22, 2017, 2:14 am
Opinion Times Sep 22, 2017, 1:52 am
CNSNews.com Headlines Sep 22, 2017, 3:18 am
Reclaiming Our Children Jan 1, 1970, 7:00 am
Opinion Times Sep 21, 2017, 11:58 pm
Opinion Times Sep 21, 2017, 11:51 pm
EmpowerShop Prolife Sep 22, 2017, 12:07 am
EmpowerShop Prolife Sep 21, 2017, 11:57 pm
DEACON FOR LIFE Sep 22, 2017, 12:15 am
Fletcher's Blog Sep 21, 2017, 10:42 pm
The Aquila Report Sep 21, 2017, 4:03 am
The Aquila Report Sep 21, 2017, 4:01 am
The Aquila Report Sep 20, 2017, 4:01 am
The Aquila Report Sep 21, 2017, 4:04 am
The Aquila Report Sep 21, 2017, 4:01 am
The Aquila Report Sep 21, 2017, 4:03 am
The Aquila Report Sep 21, 2017, 4:04 am
The Aquila Report Sep 21, 2017, 4:08 am
The Aquila Report Sep 20, 2017, 4:08 am
The Aquila Report Sep 21, 2017, 4:02 am
Spero News Dec 31, 1969, 11:00 pm
PM Notes Sep 21, 2017, 9:40 pm
Opinion Times Sep 21, 2017, 9:07 pm
Opinion Times Sep 21, 2017, 9:07 pm
NoisyRoom.net Sep 21, 2017, 9:07 pm
Live Action Blog Sep 21, 2017, 8:26 pm
LifeNews Sep 21, 2017, 9:22 pm
LifeNews Sep 21, 2017, 8:10 pm
LifeNews Sep 21, 2017, 10:05 pm
FRC.org - Web Log Sep 21, 2017, 7:49 pm
Catholic Fire Sep 21, 2017, 8:26 pm
A Lifestyle of Peace Sep 21, 2017, 8:22 pm
Pro-Life Unity Jan 1, 1970, 12:00 am
Opinion Times Sep 21, 2017, 7:37 pm
Opinion Times Sep 21, 2017, 7:37 pm
Opinion Times Sep 21, 2017, 7:37 pm
Opinion Times Sep 21, 2017, 7:37 pm
Opinion Times Sep 21, 2017, 7:37 pm
Operation Rescue Sep 21, 2017, 5:43 pm
LifeNews Sep 21, 2017, 7:25 pm
LifeNews Sep 21, 2017, 7:50 pm