Barack Obama is the most extreme pro-abortion candidate ever to seek the office of President of the United States. He is the most extreme pro-abortion member of the United States Senate. Indeed, he is the most extreme pro-abortion legislator ever to serve in either house of the United States Congress. - Robert George
Robert George's critique of Barack Obama's ardent and proactive promotion of abortion is simply devastating. Anyone who suggests a pro-lifer in good conscience can vote for the candidate is either delusional or seriously misguided.
Robert George's critique of Barack Obama's ardent and proactive promotion of abortion is simply devastating. Anyone who suggests a pro-lifer in good conscience can vote for the candidate is either delusional or seriously misguided.
Life and the Fourteenth Amendment!
Hello All,
This is an exact copy of a post at my personal blog "The Doctrine of Original Intent" that I wrote in responce to "Bornalivetruth.org Ad Challenges Obama on Abortion Related Votes". I have included all the related video's below.
What gets me realy riled in this "life" issue is Obama's position doesn't even follow his or the left's own past positions. In partial birth abortion their whole case revolves around the fact that the child's head is not outside the womb. If the childs head was outside the womb, that child would be considered alive and a "Person" having the full U.S. citizen rights under the Constitution. Yet in this case of "Born Alive Infant Protection" the child is fully outside the womb, living and breathing on it's own, with it's umbilical cord already cut, and "YES" has full constitutional rights and they won't even support life then. According to Illinois State law these children get both birth and death certificates. Yet Obama says things like "Since the intention was to kill the child we might as well finish the job" or "It would be to much of a burden to bring in another doctor". Not to mention the fact that it is illegal to refuse medical help to anyone who needs it at a hospital. Any illegal immigrant can walk into any hospital; have no money and they must receive treatment. Yet this child is left to die, ALONE in that same hospital! The issue of supporting life is more then just a debate about choice and privacy, it is a matter of grave moral injustice.
There was a time in this country when Obama would have been considered property. Evil would thrive on the backs of this sub-human property that had no human rights. At that time it was being debated just a strong as abortion is today, just as 50 –50, and just as today the debate missed the true point. It split this nation in two. It took one man, Abraham Lincoln (a white man), to stand up with the republican party against this moral injustice. At the time Lincoln was just as unpopular a president as Bush is today, yet, history tells us he was one of the greatest president we have ever had. This, however, does not even compare to the many millions who died to defend Obama's right to live as a free human. It then took this nation over 100 years, until the conclusion of a the 60's, to get to the point where true healing would start to take hold. This was Martin Luther King's Dream, "That one day this country would live up to it's creed. That all men are "created" equal with inalienable human rights (Life, Liberty, & Persuit of Happiness)". So even if "It's above Obama's Pay Grade", it's wasn't above the founding father's. They new that life started at "Creation" and not at birth.
Obama then needs to remember how many more brave men have died to defend this nation to be a free nation since the civil war. How dare Obama not support life in all forms when so many have given so much to set him free and give him life. I too have gone out and defended Obama while in the military. I today would still defend Obama's right to life and freedom under the fourteenth amendment, "To My Death". This is what real Americans do for their countrymen. Just like our brave men & women who volunteer to serve are doing today.
The Fourteenth Amendment (Amendment XIV) to the United States Constitution is one of the post-Civil War Reconstruction Amendments, first intended to secure the rights of former slaves. It guarantees the due process and equal protection of each state's laws.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law ; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Ok Lets get real! No other issue in this campaign even comes close to this one. Not only does this show Obama is just wrong, but a bold face liar as well. When the LIB'S of all LIB'S stand up in front of the Senate and support this bill, and Obama still voted against it, four times, it shows just who is the one truly "OUT OF TOUCH"! If this man's views are that bad that he would take life and use the Constitution to defend himself how can he trusted to make any other decision!
Watch the videos closely you will get the full story, and not in my words.
"The Doctrine of Original Intent"
As Always Thanks for being involved, Many Blessings, Shane
"Standing Strong" & "Closing Ranks"
and still in the "Hunt For Red November"
"More details at The National Right To Life"
"Jill Stanek on Fox with Sean Hannity"
"www.bornalivetruth.org Ad"
"Gianna Jessen "Abortion Survivor" on Fox News"
"Obama's own Extreme words"
Patrick Buchanan says that Roe and Doe occurred in the atmosphere of a decision-making vacuum: politicians were unwilling to take responsibility for solving grievous problems, so they were glad to shirk, off onto the courts, their duty to legislate. The current power alignment first emerged when African-American bass Paul Robeson ("Old Man River") was running around "Uncle Joe" Stalin's Russia (70 million murders to his credit) complaining, quite legitimately, (if delusional about his audience), about African-Americans' treatment in the U.S. The upshot was that it was left to the court to issue the Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka decision of 1954, which struck the first blow against racism in America. (Contrast that with the fact that the JFK administration was unwilling to enforce the few rudimentary civil rights laws there were before LBJ's "Great Society" and the Civil Rights Act of 1964.) Long story short, while the Constitution makes no mention of privacy, the responsibility vacuum made it possible for the court to dream one up. Of course Roe & Doe aren't "legal" in that they were never legislated. Judicial scholar Robert Lowry Clinton argues in the January, 1999 issue of First Things ("How the Court became Supreme", article available online), that prior to that time (the 1950s), both the Congress & the President interpreted the Constitution - indeed, issued most of the Constitutional interpretations that were made - and that the court's Constitutional role was quite strictly limited to questions that pertained to its own operations! Not a whisper prior to that time of today's strangulating regulation by the court of the most intimate parts of our lives. So, you see, it's not the court's fault, in a sense, it's our chicken-noodle politicians, by tacit relegation of their responsibilities to a conveniently unelected elite - that's exactly, explicitly the point! - who are responsible for the "penumbras" of privacy and the self-definitions of "one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life".