What is going on in Missouri? What happened to free speech? Who do the the media and law enforcement officers in the video think they are that they can obliterate free speech and "assist Obama's campaign in making tacit threats to the public in general and McCain supporters in particular"?
Watch this video and you get the feeling that Stalin has just taken over Missouri law enforcement and Missouri public officials.
From our previous post on Obama's goons and their incredible attack on free speech (and by the way, the ads that have been the main focus of their attacks in Ohio and Pennsylvania are absolutely true - here's the text that the Obama campaign sent the Missouri officials): Missouri governor goes nuclear on Obama for using prosecutors on campaign "truth squad":
This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more offensive to Jefferson's thinking than using the power of the state to deprive Americans of their civil rights. The only conceivable purpose of Messrs. McCulloch, Obama and the others is to frighten people away from expressing themselves, to chill free and open debate, to suppress support and donations to conservative organizations targeted by this anti-civil rights, to strangle criticism of Mr. Obama, to suppress ads about his support of higher taxes, and to choke out criticism on television, radio, the Internet, blogs, e-mail and daily conversation about the election.
And as we have also previously noted, "Who would ever have believed that this kind of thing could happen in America? Barack Obama's brand of politics, behind his empty rhetoric of compromise and reason, has brought the old Soviet Union to America, and it's coming to a neighborhood near you if it isn't already there."
Read the rest at Hyscience


This is what he does when he's just a candidate. What would he do if he got into the White House? Have you read "The Gulag Archipelago"?
Thanks. We all ought to remember Solzhenitsyn's writings in light of Obama's actions and the gov't caused financial crisis. This week will be interesting.
Barry O. has litigated and intimidated his way across the political landscape. Why should anybody be surprised by his use of good squads to squelch critics? He's a mafia-made, media-sculpted, class A creep. No surprise here.
Not at all surprised by anything that Obama or his cultists will do in order to get him elected.
Obama has made it abundantly clear that THE most important thing to him is becomming president and that nothing else matters to him.
Hopefully enough citizens will have the sense to realize that free speech and the right of citizens to be informed about Obama's stand on issues, are more important than Obama's delusions of grandeur.
Obama voted 4 times to oppose the Born Alive Infant Protection Act in his state, was the ONLY congressman who spoke against the federal version in Congress, the federal version passed 98-0 (Obama refused to vote on it), other 'pro-choice' congressmen including Hillary Clinton voted FOR it, and Obama's thugs are trying to silence abortion survivor Gianna Jensen because she is trying to tell the citizens the truth.
Obama wants to intimidate citizens who try to inform voters of Obama's voting record. What's next? Intimidating voters who try to do their own search for info on Obama's voting record? Hmmm... why is it that Obama insists the voting citizens must be uninformed?
Obama is NOT pro-democaracy; he doesnt' want citizens to look at the issues and the candidates voting record and statements on the issues. He just wants citizens to vote for him and will uses whatever strong-arm tactics he can get away with in order to take power.
How Hitlerian and shamefully cowardly of Obama!
(And if Obama is elected everything I've said will probably become illegal.) Hey it won't be the first time in history that naive trusting citizens allowed a dictator to take over.
Is it possible that such a man could be elected president in this freedom-loving country? If so, Lincoln's fears that America could be destroyed from within may well be realized in our lifetime.
Sadly it is possible for such a man to be elected in our country. We have far too many people willing to exchange freedom for license. And far to many people have been educated (indoctrinated) by our government schools to believe that our federal government needs to be big enough to solve all our problems.
As Reagan once said: "A government big enough to grant anything is big enough to take everything."
Let me see? Obama supporters in Missouri want to expose lies about their candidate made by the McCain Campaign and his supporters, and all the preceeding comments say Obama defending himself against lies with the truth is shameful, dictatorial, Stalin-like, the end of America, etc. How does that follow? Can any of you use some logic and reality in your comments?
There is a difference between using the public pulpit vs the power of the state to "expose lies". Also, the contention is that Obama is not exposing "lies" but rather squashing disagreement.
vtvita,
Coercion is not debate, nor is it discussion.
vtvita go to the BOrn ALive Truth website to FIRST LEARN the truth, then make an informed decision about who is lying.
BTW I'd like to hear your explanation of why Hillary Clinton and even NARAL (um the National Abortion Rights Action League) didn't oppose the Born Alive Infant Protection Act like Obama did?
It is public record that Obama voted four times in his state against protecting babies who survive abortion. The final Illinois state version was identical the federal version that passed 98-0 in the senate (Obama didn't vote on the federal version). Obama was the ONLY one to speak in opposition to passing it.
So he is lying when he pretends he doesn't support infanticide or that abortionists need to be allowed to either kill or neglect to death babies who survive abrotion or else women supposedly won't be allowed to abort.
BTW vtvita, Gianna is not 'the McCain campaign', she is a private citizen who survived an abortion. She is telling the truth about Obama's voting record on the Born Alive Infant Protection Act. The abortionist who tried to kill her had already left the bulding or he would have either killed her by an act of fatal violence or by making sure she was not cared for AFTER she was outside of her mother's body.
Go to Born Alive Truth to learn the facts.
Obama alternates between lying that he didn't oppose giving protection to babies who survive abortion (his voting record reveals that's a lie) and lying that he couldn't support the Born Alive Infant Protection Act (BAIPA) because it would supposedly prevent women from being allowed to abort (reading BAIPA reveals that's a lie because BAIPA clearly states that it is not allowed to interfere with any woman's ability to get an abortion PLUS even staunch pro-abort Hillary Clinton voted for BAIPA which she obviously would NOT have done if it really threatened 'abortion rights').
It's obvious Obama is the one who is lying AND that HIS CAMPAIGN is employing bully tactics to intimidate voters and those who want to encourage voters to learn the truth before voting.
Lounge Daddy,
I totalyll agree with what you posted:
"vtvita,
Coercion is not debate, nor is it discussion."
But choicists (choice cultists) don't get it or don't care. After all, they don't get it or don't care that coercing or lying to women in order to get women to 'choose' to abort isn't really 'pro-choice' either do they?
The abortion industry and the choicist sheeple who mindlessly chant slogans consistently oppose granting pregnant women the patient protection right of Informed Consent because doing so would decrease abortion sales (if the women were told the truth about fetal development and abortion complications).
So of course they aren't in favor of citizens having the right to know the facts before choosing who they will vote for. They are pro-choose-what-THEY-want-others-to-choose: choose abortion and choose Obama is their idea of freedom of choice. And they defend whatever lies and coercion is used to achieve their agenda.
Having successfully hampered free speech, Obama lauchnes a false attack on McCain.