Americans United for Life's Charmaine Yoest takes on a Planned Parenthood spokesperson during this September 18 Fox News segment featuring debating on which presidential candidate will win the day on the abortion issue (JillStanek.com).
Isn't interesting that Barack Obama supporters continue to assert that his position is ""nuanced"? How nuanced is this (The Quick and the Dead):
catholicsview.wordpress.com: "I'll be there! What an awesome site! Please ..."
Rex Vollstedt: "The problem is Dr.Charles Murray doesn't have a ..."
rebecca: "I cannot comment on the "bogusness" of XCell ..."
C. Fitzroy: "Your post is interesting as an example of ..."
birthmom.myopenid.com: "GREAT POST! ..."
rebecca: "Thanks Christina. This is true and I mention ..."
Christina: "Actually, the biggest barrier to ASCR in the ..."
Can we at least be resonable? Barack Obama wants to reduce abortions and should get credit for that!
Reduce abortions? Please -- he would sign the 'freedom of choice' act which is designed to codify Roe v Wade and keep abortion legal. Far from reducing abortions, this would increase them a hundred fold.
Obama voted a few times against the Illinois version of the Born Alive Infants Protection Act, where babies who were born alive, either naturally or as a result of a botched abortion, would be entitled to medical care. Is this the kind of President you want in office, a man who would want living born babies to die? That's infanticide, not to mention his extremely radical pro-abortion stance that looks to keep Roe v Wade as established law. Roe v Wade is an unjust law, and therefore is no law at all. It was also made by the Judicial Branch of our government, who is trying to not only play the law makers of Congress, but also are trying to play God.
Abortion is an Obama-nation!!! Vote John McCain.