The abortion industry cannot let the Partial Birth Abortion Ban go, for three reasons....So the industry has embarked on an interesting public relations campaign.
Although it maintained for 15 years during PBA Ban court battles that the number committed was infinitesimally small, now it says the ban has created havoc in the industry.
And while it has always claimed legalized abortion is the safest surgical procedure in the history of the world, now it says the ban has forced "dangerous" abortions on mothers and abortionists.
It launched its PR campaign on July 30 with the help of United Press International, in one of the most egregious displays of journalistic deception I
have ever read....The "more dangerous... medical procedure"?
Visualizing a preborn baby's internal organs by ultrasound and injecting the heart medication
Digoxin in an FDA-unapproved use through the mother's abdomen and into the heart of her thrashing baby (no one likes needles) to cause an instant, deadly heart attack....Pay attention. Since the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the PBA ban this past April, paranoia has apparently struck the entire late-term abortion industry, forcing these specialized deed-doers out in the open. And there are apparently quite a few, with lots of spectators....
But despite the media's best help, the pro-PBA campaign is ill-conceived, availing itself to an array of pro-life inquiries and talking points. These are....
Continue reading my column today, "Killer cupid abortionists,"on WorldNetDaily.com.
I agree that they're shooting themselves in the foot with this one. It's like the Fugitive Slave Act -- it's as if the forces of evil are compelled to destroy themselves somehow.
Do they really think they can admit these things in public and maintain the falacy that abortion doesn't kill a baby?