I've posted a couple of comments (here and here) on the New England Journal of Medicine article, "Religion, Conscience, and Controversial Practices" on LifeEthics.org.
The majority of the docs in the survey object to abortion for contraceptive failure and nearly half object to giving 14 to 16 year olds contraception when their parents object and actually follow through on their convictions in some cases.
The authors seem to have no feeling for the history of bioethics as an outcome of the Holocaust or Tuskegee. Instead, the fuss and bother is over docs refusing to follow through on legal killing.
Yeah, the authors seem pretty indifferent.
But I guess they just don't find it that reason that important for them.
Josef Mengele was an abortionist. I guess he's also their role model of a doctor who never let silly things like "ethics" get in the way of doing the job.
You can get the full story at this link