January 2007 Archives

January 31, 2007

Rich Lowry suggests that former Massachusetts governor Gov. Mitt Romney's "account of how he came to change his view on abortion—through the issue of stem-cell research—isn't very compelling and he would probably be better off not talking about it at all. "

A pro-life reader disagrees:

I have to disagree with your assertion that Romney's account of he came to change his views of abortion "isn't very compelling" and that "people aren't going to believe it."

Pro-lifers greatly enjoy learning about that moment when it clicked for pro-life converts. Each pro-life convert has his or her own story about what it was that caused them to see the light. Governor Romney's account makes perfect sense. When he had to study the origins of life as he pondered an embryonic stem cell bill, he realized the truth: life begins at conception. It's a fully plausible account and it's also interesting that his study of embryonic stem cell research, a fairly new frontier on the decades old abortion debate, caused him to change his view.

I agree that pro-lifers enjoy hearing about that "moment when it clicked" and are generally quite accepting when an abortion advocate finally recognizes the sanctity of human life and begins to act upon their new found belief. Many within our ranks and authors at this blog can identify with Romney’s “epiphany”.

But is there reason to approach Romney’s conversion with skepticism? In 2002, Planned Parent and NARAL questionnaires show Romney as decidedly pro-abortion. [Jennifer Rubin - Weekly Standard]

wnd_logo.gif

An article in the Feb. 5 issue of People magazine demonstrated the persistence of liberals to march us all down the path of free love to our deaths.

I don't understand why young people would trust the ideology of those who sought their demise before they were born, but here's one: 33-year-old abortion survivor (which anyone under the age of 34 is) turned actress turned cervical cancer survivor, Marissa Jaret Winokur.

Winokur is best known for her Tony Award-winning performance as Tracy Turnblad in the Broadway musical "Hairspray."

According to the People story's teaser, Tracy "learned the cause of her cervical cancer and now makes sure other women know how to prevent it."

The sole cause of cervical cancer is human papillomavirus, or HPV, a sexually transmitted disease.

So Winokur contracted cervical cancer due to sexual promiscuity, or to put it as ambiguously as possible,
said Winokur, "I learned about a year ago that HPV, a common virus, causes cervical cancer."

The "prevention," according to Winokur? No, not a chaste lifestyle....

Continue reading my column today, "People Magazine: Don't stop, get a shot" on WND.com.

January 29, 2007

Portugal considers abortion - Thousands of pro-life demonstrators marched through the capital city of Portugal yesterday, in anticipation of a national referendum on legalizing abortion scheduled in two weeks’ time. - LifeSiteNews

David Prentice Strikes Back
- Science Magazine has finally printed his response to the stem cell hit piece they published six months ago. - Second Hand Smoke

Fiction for Fundraising? - Have you ever heard of the "Federal Abortion Ban?" Neither has JivinJ.

The baby's civil rights - "The babies need us," Alveda King told a packed state House chamber Saturday in Vermont. "You know, they're like a slave in the womb of a mom. The mom's deciding whether they will live or die. It's civil rights."

A brutal solution to stigma - A Uganda Parliament member asserts child killing is merciful in some cases? "How would society look at a child born to a girl by her father? So, to save such a girl from lifetime trauma and stigma, safe abortion should be carried out," she said. - AllAfrica

She's now pro-life - The Eastern Echo reports that before "Jane Roe fought for her reproductive rights in 1973, abortion was illegal in all but four states and abortions in those states were given only in dire situations." The paper apparently found irrelevant the fact that Norma McCorvey (aka Jane Roe) is now opposed to abortion. "I'm one hundred percent sold out to Jesus and one hundred percent pro-life," she writes. "No exceptions. No compromise."

Purpose - Mark Pickup (HumanLifeMatters) explains "Why". I had to be brought low in order to understand higher things. I had to reach the end of my tether. Only then in defeat, after a life-long illusion that I could soar on my own power crashed, did God set me free inside. Although outwardly I am decaying, inwardly I am renewed daily. (2Cor.4.16). Also, consider Mark's post on spiritual blessings found in suffering.

New legislation was announced today that would ban abortion in South Dakota state except in limited instances. The AP Reports that copies of the bill with full details were not available, and legislators refused to reveal specifics. However, Bob Ellis from the Dakota Voice had a preview of the bill last Friday. He writes:

If it comes out essentially unchanged from what it was on Friday, it's a bill I can fully endorse. My only caveat is that last year's bill was my #1 choice, being more consistent from a pro-life and scientific perspective, since all human life is sacred, no matter how it was conceived.

This one is intended to have exceptions for rape, incest, and the health of the mother. While traditionally these exceptions have been big enough to drive the space shuttle through, this draft has those exceptions very tightly regulated to prevent misuse and abuse.


kubby.jpgCalling herself the "pro-life executive director" of the Emma Goldman Clinic abortion mill in Iowa City, Iowa, Karen Kubby took the occasion of the anniversary of Roe v. Wade to reflect in a Jan. 25 opinion piece in the Iowa City Press-Citizen. Highlights:

I am pro-life. I believe strongly in the value of living beings on this planet. I celebrate life in a variety of ways through my daily activities and spiritual life. I recognize the lives gained through abortion. I see the lives of women and their children who are stronger and more stable because of a decision toward abortion....

A decision about abortion is decidedly pro-life. It is a respectful and moral option....

I know one party in abortion who likely feels a tad disrespected.

And which children are stronger and more stable? Aside from those killed, the child abuse rate of those left behind has skyrocketed over 300% since abortion was legalized.

On Jan. 27, at the Emma Goldman Choice Dinner to raise funds for abortion, Kubby reported, according to the DailyIowan.com, "the clinic raised enough money last year... to subsidize 1,143 abortions, and the clinic hopes 2007 will be just as successful."

Be it Freudian or purposeful, "successful" is an interesting word choice for the "pro-life" director of an abortion mill to use while citing her abortion stats.

Hat tip: Michelle L.
[Photo from Iowa City Press-Citizen]

Sen. Sam Brownback has consistently spoken out against the genocide of the disabled. In this video, recorded during the Blogs4Life Conference, he promotes an awareness of the value of all lives and, in particular, children with Down Syndrome.


IMG_0595.JPG

The Family Research Council writes what we've all been thinking:

What a difference an ideology makes. Last Monday, 200,000 pro-lifers descended on the nation's capital to peacefully protest 34 years of abortion-on-demand. Despite record crowds and a line-up of speakers that included President Bush by phone, the March for Life earned little more than a footnote in the nation's news.

Days later, radical anti-war protestors staged a march in Washington that mustered only 10,000, and the event made the front page of nearly every newspaper in America. Yet for all the media the small demonstration received, few news outlets reported the true headline of the day.

According to reports, hundreds of demonstrators were allowed to take the steps of the U.S. Capitol during the march and desecrate the property with "anarchist symbols." When police formed a security line to stop them, U.S. Capitol Police Chief Phillip Morse ordered his men to fall back and allow the protestors to "exercise their First Amendment rights" by spray-painting the Capitol grounds with graffiti. One source at the scene said that Morse issued an order that no one was to be arrested for desecrating America's and arguably the world's greatest symbol of democracy. In an e-mail on his actions, Morse writes, "The graffiti was easily removed by the [Architect of the Capitol] staff... It is [our] duty and responsibility to protect the Capitol complex, while allowing the public to exercise their [freedom of speech]." Imagine the response had Christians "trespassed" onto this public property and prayed for our leaders! I dare say the outcome would have been quite different. Unlike last Monday's peaceful pro-life protest, this mob of liberals was given access and leniency to commit criminal acts on government property.

This special treatment is unacceptable. The Capitol Chief of Police reports directly to the Speaker of the House, a title which now belongs to one of the demonstrators' most outspoken allies, Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). Surely, the tens of millions of dollars the American people have invested in the security of their Capitol means there is videotape that will assist in the identification and arrest of the perpetrators. Speaker Pelosi should direct that investigation and prosecution go forward.

Hey, even the small group of right-to-die pro-euthanasia fanatic retirees faired better in the Arizona press than the March for Life.

Others are commenting, notably PowerlineBlog and Michelle Malkin, regarding the disparity in coverage.

Note: We captured the March for Life crowd: click here. Also, check out this video.

Photo: A fraction of the March for Life participants.

Earlier this mother the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommended that all pregnant women be offered screening for Down syndrome in their unborn babies. The announcement marks a major shift in "prenatal care" and illicited an understanble outcry among pro-lifers and groups that serve individuals with Down syndrome.

George Will, in his exceptional column George Will Golly, What Did Jon Do? explains:

The ACOG guidelines are formally neutral concerning what decisions parents should make on the basis of the information offered. But what is antiseptically called "screening" for Down syndrome is, much more often than not, a search-and-destroy mission: At least 85 percent of pregnancies in which Down syndrome is diagnosed are ended by abortions.
Barbara Curtis(MommyLife) posted a press release put out by the National Down Syndrome Congress:
The National Down Syndrome Congress (NDSC) condemns recent recommendations by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) that convey tacit approval for terminating pregnancies where the fetus has Down syndrome.

more

And, Candy Slice and RealChoice suggest the attack on kids with Down Syndrome through abortion will rise beyond its current outrageously high level.

I’ve summarized the recent events because of a letter I received from a good friend who has a wonderful child, a son, with Down Syndrome. He writes,

Is there an appropriate way to consider the prenatal testing that the medical society is pushing for? I’m regularly reading newspaper articles about how the medical community is demanding that all women’s babies be tested for things like Down Syndrome at a much earlier stage in the pregnancy—I think before 3 months. While I have nothing against the testing in itself because it could help prepare people for upcoming medical difficulties, the fact remains that people often are much more willing to abort the children when they know it has Downs. Under these circumstances, assuming that Christians do not abort and non-Christians often abort, I’m wondering if Christians will soon bear the brunt of higher insurance premiums since they will not abort and insist on taking the “risk” of having a medically challenged child. Worse yet, some weaker Christians may make the horrible mistake of aborting due to pressures put on them by the medical community when it is determined that they are pregnant w/ a Downs child and the “risk” level is much higher for the child.

In conclusion, while the prenatal testing issue is what caused me to write to you, my underlying concern is that prenatal testing should not be used to confuse or weaken the resolve of any Christian, strong or weak, to become the father or mother of a child w/ Downs Syndrome. To have such a child is a gift from God. A different gift to be sure and one that will probably require more patience, time and yes, even money. Maybe even more tears. For many Americans, such a gift sounds scary and certainly not fun. While I won’t say that being a father to a son w/ Downs has been without scary times, I will say this—if raised in a Christian home, a child w/ Downs will show his family a more complete meaning of love and devotion than they have ever imagined.


tragedy.jpgThe Jan. 29-Feb. 5 issue of U. S. News & World Report included this in an article by Lewis Lord, "A conqueror more lethal than the sword" :

Experts believe that in 1492 perhaps 10 million people lived above the Rio Grande - twice as many as may have inhabited the British Isles at that time. The hemisphere's population possibly exceeded 15th-century Europe's 70 million. But by 1650, records suggest that only 6 million Indians remained in the New World. The catastrophic loss of native life, wrote Alfred Crosby, author of The Columbian Exchange, "was surely the greatest tragedy in the history of the human species."

That is incorrect. With regrets that they in actuality win the title of Greatest Tragedy in the History of the Human Species, babies aborted worldwide have surpassed the one billion mark.

This according to the Guttmacher Institute, research arm of Planned Parenthood, which estimates 46 million babies are aborted around the world each year. So this statistic is just for the past 20 years. The U. S. Census Bureau estimates the world's current population is almost 6.6 billion, so no other comparison can possibly come close.

[Painting: Picasso's "Tragedy"]

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee on Saturday made it official, he is seeking the 2008 Republican presidential nomination.

"People want an authentic conservative who has a proven record of results," Huckabee said in a statement. "I've concluded that I should take this necessary and vital step to bring a new kind of optimistic leadership to the public square."

For over a year prolifeblogs.com has aggregated and promoted the site Mike Huckabee President 2008 and followed with anticipation his exploration of the presidential nomination. Huckabee’s team now suggest that we learn more about him at the Explore Huckabee website.

Charmaine Yoest live blogged Huckabee’s speech to the National Review Institute and he appeared on Sunday's Meet the Press.

Related: LifeNews and CNS News

Posted by Britt Shankle on ContraceptionBlog.com

A new study was released Wednesday that discloses the role that estrogen plays in breast cancer. Through the University of Illinois, researchers announced that not only does estrogen speed up the process of breast cancer once it has started and help to transport the disease to other cells, but it actually can block our immune cells from being able to kill these cancerous cells. It does this by inducing the expression of an inhibitor enzyme, much like similar inhibitors that can cause depression by blocking the release of serotonin. This study, which is the first of its kind, reports that

“when estrogen binds with an estrogen receptor the complex promotes production of a granzyme inhibitor, proteinase inhibitor 9 (PI-9). That inhibitor binds the granzyme, preventing it from initiating the molecular cascade that kills tumor cells.”

That’s a fancy way of saying that an excess of estrogen won’t let our white blood cells do their job. The scientists go on to point out that it wasn’t previously known that estrogen played this specific role in breast cancer, and that "the amounts of estrogen required to do this are quite small" (David Shapiro, a UI professor of biochemistry who conducted the study).

January 28, 2007

marissa2.jpgThe Feb. 5 issue of People magazine included a story about actress Marissa Jaret Winokur who, according to the teaser, "learned the cause of her cervical cancer and now makes sure other women know how to prevent it."

The sole cause of cervical cancer is human papillomavirus (HPV), a sexually transmitted disease. Winokur contracted cervical cancer at age 27 due to previous sexual promiscuity, or to put it as ambiguously as possible, said Winokur, "I learned about a year ago that HPV, a common virus, causes cervical cancer. Now there is an HPV test that might have caught my precancerous cells earlier."

The "prevention," according to Winokur? No, not a chaste lifestyle. "There's a vaccine, which can be given to women before they're sexually active," she said in People. "It makes sense to take these precautions. I'll encourage my friends' teenage daughters to get vaccinated."

Aside from the fact Winokur has no business telling other people's children "precautions" to avoid the pitfalls of promiscuous sex, her advice stinks. Let's not address the real cause. Let's try to avoid the ramifications of the cause.

Now Winokur cannot have children because she had to have a hysterectomy. Not to worry. She plans to harvest eggs from her remaining ovaries. To do so she will have to inject megadoses of steroids into her body over a prolonged period of time. That should keep her on a healthy track - not. Winokur is currently looking for a surrogate.

Winokur and People only fuel the exploitation and health demise of women by refusing to acknowledge the only full proof way to avoid HPV or cervical cancer: abstinence.


sam_brownback_signs.jpg

Senator Sam Brownback (KS) drew an enthusiastic response during the recent March for Life in Washington DC that was arguably bigger than that of any other politician. To some extent, the positive reaction was fueled by an exceptional turnout by Brownback's Kansas constituents who appeared to be well represented, organized and vigorous in their applause.

In my opinion, however, it wasn't just Kansans who were excited by Brownback's attendance at the March or his announcement to seek the country's highest office in 2008. The Senator is a breath of fresh air in a field of presidential candidates who have hung their hats on superficial makeovers, doublespeak and exploitation of the U.S. response to Terrorism. His stand on issues proceeds from principles rather than the latest opinion poll and his campaign rests on making America a greater nation rather than advancing his own self-interest.

I suggest our readers examine his announcement for President. As you read it, I think you will find it consistent with how he has lived his life - genuine and authentic.

sam_brownback_stage2.jpg
He advocates for passionately fighting for the dignity of every human life, renewing family and culture, healing our land and seeking reconciliation. He recently called for the divestiture of state pension funds from investments in companies that do business with the genocidal government of Sudan after divesting his own funds.

Fiscal soundness echo in his criticism of pork-barrel projects, promotion of tax reform, and market-based solutions for healthcare. As a member of the Senate Judicial Committee, he advocates for judges who want to be judges…not legislators.

As a leading pro-life voice in the Senate he spoke effectively during the confirmation hearings of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito against the judicial tyranny that brought the scourge of legalized abortion to the United States:

Among the most famous of these Supreme Court cases of exercise of political power I believe are the cases of Roe V. Wade and Doe v. Bolton, two 1973 cases based on false statements which created a constitutional right to abortion.

And you can claim whatever you want to of being pro-life or pro- choice, but the right to a abortion is not in the Constitution. The court created it. It created a constitutional right. And these decisions removed a fully appropriate political judgment from the people of the several states and has led to many adverse consequences.


The result of abortion, according to Brownback, is the complete "killing of a whole class of people in America."
...between 80 percent to 90 percent of the children in America diagnosed with Down's Syndrome will be killed in the womb simply because they have a positive genetic test which can be wrong, and is often wrong, but they would have a positive genetic test for Down's Syndrome and they will be killed.

America is poorer because of such a policy. We are at our best when we help the weakest. The weak make us strong. To kill them makes us all the poorer, insensitive, calloused and jaded.

Roe has made it not only possible, but has found it constitutional to kill a whole class of people, simply because of their genetic make-up.

Those who attended Blogs4Life heard a similar statement from Brownback regarding the selective killing of unborn children with Down's Syndrome followed by an appeal for adoption rather than abortion.

Few candidates have the ability to write the following with sincerity:

At the end of the day, it comes back to the basics: faith, family, and freedom. America is great because she is good. That goodness is not based in Washington, or New York, or even Topeka. It is based in the hearts of the American people. This is a goodness whose Author is the Divine. A goodness that doesn't let us rest until our neighbor is at peace. A goodness that feels the chains of another rub on our own skin. A goodness from God that demands our vigilant action.

How much better we will be as we seek to live the Great Commandment to love God and one another.


January 27, 2007
The crowd marched toward the Capitol to the tune of God Bless America during the 2007 March for Life. This video captures only a fraction of the individuals present but is impressive nonetheless.

Update: check out this picture assembled from the video (amazing!)

A reader from a similar background wrote to me:

Barbara, After our decision to try to have another baby, I started thinking and couldn't stop. I've never tried to have a baby before. There have been times when I didn't try not to have one, but that's not really the same. The memory of my abortion has really been haunting me lately. Sometimes I feel like I don't deserve another child because of it. I'm coming to the conclusion that I probably need counseling about this, and hoped you would provide some insight as to how to find the best counseling options.

In case any of you are dealing with similar issues, please read my answer, filling in the blank with your name:

Posted by Genevieve Parker on ContraceptionBlog.com

First off, I'd like to extend a warm welcome to Britt - so glad you're joining NRFC's blogging team!

Also, here's an interesting article about the phenomenon of transsexual fish in Boulder Creek, Colorado.

In 2004, David Norris reported that fish just below the Boulder, Colo., Wastewater Treatment Plant's outflow pipe were changing sex.

..... surprisingly low concentrations of treatment-plant effluent can change male fish into females.

The 2004 study showed that certain chemicals from pharmaceuticals and personal-care products made it through the Boulder Wastewater Treatment Plant and into Boulder Creek. Ninety percent of the white suckers swimming downstream of the plant were female. Upstream, there was an even split.

"What we see in the fish downstream is as if they are taking birth control pills," Norris said.

Posted on ContraceptionBlog.com by Britt Shankle.

As I promised, here's a short synopsis of how Project Plus came to be, and what we're doing now.

Like I said earlier, we are a group of college students who were all concerned about the Women's Clinic re-opening on our campus after nearly 4 years without a physician who would do the necessary physical exams to prescribe Birth Control. Within the past 4 years, the Health clinic had routinely dispensed BC to all female students who had an active prescription at their discounted price, but they could not provide new students with prescriptions, so their customer base had decreased exponentially each year. In fact, when they started back up, they had so few students still on the plan, that they weren't even keeping the pill stocked at our school, but giving the students discounts if they went across the street to the grocery store pharmacy to buy it.

I'd like to introduce the latest member of the NRFC blogging team, Britt Shankle.

Britt has been involved in Project Plus, a campaign to educate college students about the harms of contraception.

Here's more about Britt in her own words.

My name is Britt and I'm a recent graduate of a public university in Virginia. Ruben has invited me to join the blogging team, and I very happy to have accepted.

Before I get into anything too deep, I thought it would be appropriate to let those of you who read this blog know who I am. As I said, I am a recent graduate from college, where I headed up a campaign to educate my peers about the harmful effects of birth control. We started as a small group of concerned students who wanted to let our peers in on the negative effects of Birth Control. We've billowed out into a somewhat national project, called Project Plus, in just the last few months with schools from all over participating. You can check it out here.

January 26, 2007

As the mainstream media editorialize outgoing Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, I can’t help but compare their opposition to the 34-minute execution of convicted killer Angel Diaz with their support of the 14-day execution of my sister, Terri Schiavo....

Orlando Sentinel, 12-28-06

[Gov. Jeb Bush's] intervention in the Terri Schiavo fiasco, without even talking to her husband, was unconscionable.

News-press.com, 12-19-06

Gov. Jeb Bush was wise to suspend executions and order the review of lethal injection procedures after the bungled execution of a convicted murderer last week.

Miami Herald, 1-8-07

terri3.jpg

It will be difficult for the public to forget [Bush's] disgraceful performance in the Terri Schiavo case, just one of a number of legal battles in which the ACLU engaged his administration because of his posture that public policy "should err on the side of life.''

FloridaToday .com, 12-20-06

Gov. Jeb Bush was correct to impose a hold on death warrants in Florida following the gruesome execution of Angel Diaz.....

Convicted murderer Diaz was put to death by lethal injection, taking 34 minutes to die.... That likely violates the constitutional mandate against cruel and unusual punishment....

An American Bar Association study... cited more than a dozen glaring flaws [with Florida's death penalty process]. Among them....

  • Florida unjustly imposes the death penalty on persons with severe mental disabilities.

Orlando Sentinel , 12-31-06

... Mr. Bush... insisted on intervening in the case of brain-damaged Terri Schiavo.

The Ledger (Associated Press), 12-17-06

Article title: "Doctors: Botched execution likely slow, painful"

Death penalty foes have for years warned of a worst-case scenario in which an inmate being executed by lethal injection could remain conscious, experiencing severe pain as he slowly dies. That day may finally have come.

"It really sounds like [Angel Diaz] was tortured to death," said Jonathan Groner, associate professor of surgery at the Ohio State Medical School.... "My impression is that it would cause an extreme amount of pain."...

terri.jpg[W]itnesses reported movement of Diaz as long as 24 minutes after the first injection, with him grimacing, blinking, licking his lips, blowing and attempting to mouth words. At one point, about midway through the process, he turned his head toward witnesses....

Tampa Tribune, 1-31-07

Family members - and later state lawmakers, with Bush's support - tried to force [Terri's] sustenance. Courts stopped the Legislature, and later Bush, from ordering a feeding tube reinserted..... Despite overwhelming public distaste over the government's intervention - by a 2-1 ratio in one poll - Bush remains unrepentant.

I don’t believe in the deliberate killing of any human being.

But if the press is so worried about cruel and unusual punishment of convicted murderers by lethal injection, perhaps they would consider it better to starve and dehydrate them to death.

Because as the press constantly reminded us, death by dehydration and starvation of innocent disabled people who have committed no crime is a “peaceful and painless” way to die.

January 25, 2007

On the 34th anniversary of the infamous Roe V. Wade decision, Stacy Harp attended the City of Orange's pro-life candlelight vigil to remember and pray for those impacted by abortion. Stacy interviews Patsy, Joan and Sam about why they engage in prolife activism, and also to a group of young feminists and pro-choicers who try to explain why they believe killing preborn babies is okay. You'll definitely want to listen and then tell a friend... click here.

No one wants the government rifling through his or her bank accounts. The FBI has no business perusing your grocery lists. The right of privacy is clear in this country. With very few exceptions, the government has no reason to mandate that you tell them about your finances, your relationships, or your personal health.

That is why Representative Naomi Jakobsson's bill, HB115, is unconstitutional. The bill requires that sixth grade girls receive the vaccination for HPV before going to public or private school. Many similar laws and proposals have cropped up in other states as well.


IMG_0595.JPG

Yes, the crowd at this year's March for Life was massive. Similar to Barbara, I've published a short photo album here. The fundamental story, however, is not the size of the gathering or even the number of congressional representatives who spoke. The most important issue of day is that the participants were there to commemorate the Supreme Court ruling that has led to the slaughter of over 45,000,000 Americans.

wnd_logo.gif

You would have a difficult time figuring out Barack Obama supports infanticide by the Jan. 17 Associated Press story entitled, "Obama record may be gold mine for critics."

Each of five times the AP referred to Obama's votes as state senator against legislation to stop infanticide, it softened the blow to make it unintelligible to the fetus on the street....

Any dictionary defines "fetus" as "an unborn or unhatched vertebrate ... a developing human from usually three months after conception to birth"....

But the AP couldn't admit abortion has extended to killing born children in the U.S.:

[Obama] voted against requiring medical care for aborted fetuses who survive....

Giving noncredit where it's due, the AP is not the only mainstream media outlet to handle the topic of babies aborted alive with fetus gloves....

The Southern Illinoisan reported Jan. 21, "Obama voted against a measure designed to protect what supporters termed live babies born during abortion procedures," as if pro-lifers made that term up....

Continue reading my column today, "The AP's fetus frenzy," on WND.com.

January 24, 2007

Posted by Genevieve Parker on ContraceptionBlog.com

Replying to several press releases from yesterday, the FDA issued a statement affirming that there is NO PROBLEM with the EFFECTIVENESS of the hormonal contraceptives currently approved at this time. So, no worries, their primary concern - contraceptive effectiveness - is totally under control. I guess it's of much lesser concern that the studies on which they base the approval of these physiology-altering drugs are potentially flawed in their representative safety claims.

Posted by Genevieve Parker on ContraceptionBlog.com

First of all, kudos to Ruben's efforts to raise awareness about the harms of birth control at the recent March for Life in Washington, D.C. As we've stressed time & again, abortion & contraception are bound up in the assault of the same principle; that is, respect for the dignity of human life, whether that be the dignity of a woman or the dignity of a pre-born child. Contraception & abortion exist on a continuum that - in principle - violates human dignity.

In other news, have a look at this recent article in the Washington Post regarding the FDA's standards for the approval of various types of hormonal contraceptives. The very first sentence of the article reads,

"The government is considering setting higher standards for birth control drugs used by millions, saying that newer pills appear to be less effective at preventing pregnancy than those approved decades ago."

spy.jpg
It appears pro-aborts infiltrated FRC's Blogs4Life conference, not that I minded. "Amused" and "intrigued" would be better descriptors. The hope is always that exposure to unfiltered pro-life truths will make a positive impact.

Not so this time. Ann, the blogger at feministing.com, was not a spy who loved us. She said this, among other things, which strikes me as one of the all-time classicly ironic, appallingly blind statements I've ever read:

See, if you ask Sam Brownback, one of the problems with America is that we treat fetuses as second-class citizens, much like African-Americans were treated in the pre-civil rights era. Does this seem more than a little insulting to anyone else? Saying that black people and fetuses (and really, embryos) should be considered "equally human"? Wow.

While maintaining it's ridiculous to compare our country's previous legal position that blacks weren't "equally human" with our country's current legal position that preborns aren't "equally human," Ann scoffs that preborns aren't equally human? Incredible.

I'm blogging additional responses to Ann and her readers on her blog, if you'd care to join the mêlée.

Another pro-abort blogger at CampusProgess.org entitled her description of the event, "Anti-choicers get a life," to which there are good responses.

News organizations infozine.com and spokesmanreview.com both covered the conference well, with the latter also blogging on it.

January 23, 2007

This past Monday at the blogs for life conference, I had an opportunity to speak with both Senator Sam Brownback and Representative Duncan Hunter about the harms of contraception. Now before you pro-contraception bloggers get happy and start ranting on how these candidates are going to take away your condoms, the focus was not on banning contraception. And yes, I'm going to try and speak with Democratic and independent candidates on this issue as well.

January 22, 2007

As a former radical leftist, I attended many demonstrations in Washington, DC.

Now having attended the March for Life two years in a row, I'm amazed at how under-reported this event is - and all too aware of how that under-reporting contributes to the rampant stereotyping of pro-lifers as middle-aged white males.

I actually saw very few of those today!

What I saw were hundreds of thousands of people willing to brave the cold (DC had its first snow of the winter the night before) to affirm that a baby in the womb is not property to be destroyed, but a person that those committed to human rights must defend.

It's a child, not a choice!

I took 207 pictures today, and though I've had time to edit, my comments will have to wait 'til tomorrow. In the meantime, you can see a slideshow by clicking on the album below:

Enjoy!
Barbara Curtis
MommyLife

The March for Life was simply massive, bigger than last year. It is hard to estimate the number of participants because it was impossible to see more than about one quarter of the crowd as any one time. We'll publish more information and photos later and link to friends who are covering the March. In the meantime, here are a few images of the 2007 March for Life:

The Marchers:

IMG_0478.jpg

The Podium:

IMG_0491.jpg

Blogs4Life has begun and is being shown live over the internet at the Family Research Council's Website. Click here.

I've had a late start live blogging and will try to fill in details as the conference progresses.

9:00 am - We had a great introduction by Charmaine Yoest, one of the conference founders and Vice President of Communications of the FRC. [note - thanks Charmaine and the FRC for hosting Blogs4Life!]

IMG_0317.jpg9:05 am - Tony Perkins, President of the FRC, commemorates the 34th Anniversary of Roe v. Wade and provides encouraging signs for the future.

IMG_0328.jpg

9:15 am - Bobby Schindler revealed the untold story about how he and a blogger from Florida began publicizing his sister's fate. He makes a good point that the media has now re-written his sister's story, erroneously referring her to as "brain dead". Bobby calls bloggers to publish the facts of his sister's case.

9:35 am - Thanks for Rep. Duncan Hunter from California for stopping by and committing to take a stand for life.

IMG_0337.jpg

IMG_0350.jpg9:45 am - Jill Stanek is giving a live demonstration involving the use of this blog to communicate over the internet. Click here for her presentation. Check out her blog entry referred to in her presentation - infanticide soften by referring to a born baby as a "fetus".

We ran into a small glitch with Jill's video, which is actually available online (click here).

Jill has given a great case for why Blogs are becoming a key element of the new media. She suggests that individual bloggers pick up a specific life issue and become a topic expert.

Comments provide a means to interact with others and answer questions, especially by those who support abortion.

10:10 am - Peter Samuelson from Americans United for Life is giving a great speech on how bloggers can make a difference in the political process. Every year 1,000 pro-life bills are considered by the states and individual bloggers can make a difference by choosing a niche. "State Laws Save Lives."

I appreciate his point on human dignity. When it is no longer considered intrinsic our society begins down the path of organ harvesting from those lacking "adequate" cognitive abilities.

IMG_0376.jpg

Peter referenced an excellent resource for pro-life bloggers called "Defending Life" - if you blog you can get it free - I'll post the details after the break .

Back from the break....

IMG_0397.jpg10:55 am - Sen. Sam Brownback (who is now a presidential candidate) gave a powerful speech, centered on life issues. Among the many points he revealed 80% of unborn children with Down Syndrome are aborted – a staggering figure that ought to be unacceptable in any society. Sen. Brownback passionately addressed those with an unborn Down Syndrome, pleading with them to use adoption rather than abortion. Today, he and 25 colleagues are filing the fetal pain awareness act - unborn children are given anesthesia - informing woman considering abortion makes sense.

The Senator ended his speech thanking bloggers for making a difference.

11:15 am - I was hoping we'd get to hear from Jonathan and Debrorah Flora, creators of a Distant Thunder. They are on the podium now speaking about the grassroots efforts by the bloggers that have helped the movie penetrate the significant barriers put up by the mainstream media.

Here is a picture of the Flora's with Jill Stanek

IMG_0389.jpg

11:30 am - we're off to the March for Life!!!!

2:30 pm - Back from the March: The March for Life was massive, bigger than last year.

IMG_0618.jpgRamesh Ponnuru's talk was fantastic - I'll link to the video when it's available. One, of many items, I appreciated was his evaluation of pro-life bloggers. We're not doing a very good job responding to the mistakes of the mainstream media on abortion, stem cell research and euthanasia. He suggests we network, divide the field of life issues and major media sources, and begin to respond appropriately to inaccurate reporting.

Panel Discussion - great job by Charmaine asking the right questions to provoke discussion - check out KatieFavazza's summary.

4:20 - Blogs4Life is presently in its final session with Dr. David Prentice teaching Stem Cells 101. He's actually bringing the topic down to the level his audience can appreciate.

We often hear embryonic stem cells have properties (flexibility), not available in adult stem cells. This, is simply not the case. The same characteristics are present in stem cells taken from the placenta and amniotic fluid, but without the negative propensity for tumor formation.

Right now, there are 72 successful therapeutic applications for adult stem cells with many more waiting in the wings. One individual shown by Dr. Prentice had a spinal cord injury that left her paralyzed. Adult stem cells gave her the ability to walk. And there are many, many more examples (where is the MSM!).

There are no successful applications involving embryonic stem cell research.

5:00 pm - The conference is drawing to a close. Peter Shinn (prolifenews.tv) gave some final thoughts about pro-life activism and Joe Carter concluded the conference.

I want to thank the Family Research Council for their support, which made this conference a reality.

The second annual Blogs4life Conference, hosted by the Family Research Council in Washington, D. C., and scheduled before and after the 34th Annual March for Life, will be shown live this morning beginning 9:00 a.m. EST over the Internet. Go here to see the scheduled line-up of speakers and instructions to view the conference.

Demonstrating one benefit of blogs, Jill Stanek will simultaneously show powerpoint slides live and here and on JillStanek.com during her speech, which will begin around 9:30 a.m. Web viewers may want to set up a split screen.

Jill will announce when she advances to the next slide. Click on the slide to see enlarged view.

January 21, 2007
IMG_0170.JPG

Pro-life groups from all over the country are converging on Washington D.C. in anticipation of the March for Life, a massive demonstration aimed at memorializing the Supreme Court's infamous abortion decision and petitioning the Congress for change. The event event kicks off at 12:00 pm EST with a rally overlooking the United States Capitol and culminates in the March along Constitution Avenue to the Supreme Court. As shown in the photo above, the stage was set-up on Saturday and the setting is truly remarkable.

Hundreds held signs and prayed Saturday in front of a downtown Planned Parenthood while "clinic escorts" waited eagerly for a customer to usher into the building. Participants included individuals from American Life League, Rock for Life and Pro-Life Wisconsin.

Sadly, as I watched, a group of "escorts" surrounded a young woman and guided her past the praying Christians and into the abortion mill. "It will be ok," she was told. "You'll be in the building soon." At the March for Life tomorrow, there will be hundreds present who testify to the contrary, having made a "decision" that became a source of hurt and pain. (Note: many have found healing - click here)

We don't know how many more woman approached the clinic but turned back after the pro-life witness made the dark reality of abortion evident. Photos of the event can be found below and at ProLifeNews.tv.

January 20, 2007

My friend Robin, who still lives in Marin County and heads the Pregnancy Resource Center in the midst of a culture where parents buy kids BMWs and campaign against dress codes and abstinence education sent me a link this morning to one of the most twisted pieces of liberal logic I've ever read:

On the Anniversary of Roe vs. Wade
Creating a true 'culture of life'
- Lynn M. Paltrow

For the past 10 years, the term "culture of life" has been little more than window dressing for the hundreds of laws that limit access to abortion -- or advance the interests of fetuses, as if they existed separately from the pregnant women who carry them. The time has come to have a real conversation about what our country could be doing to support maternal, fetal and familial health, and to value motherhood and child rearing. . .

Our lawmakers pump an incredible amount of funding into pregnancy "crisis centers" whose primary purpose is to deter women from having abortions -- despite the fact that staff have been documented providing false and misleading information. [speaking of documentation, Ms. Paltrow, how about this documentation of Planned Parenthood abortion clinics aiding and abetting statutory rape?] At the same time, drug treatment programs for pregnant and parenting women in many parts of the United States lack the funding they need to stay open or to meet the pressing demands for their services. . .

What if our lawmakers swapped their priorities? What if they de-funded pregnancy crisis centers, whose only real purpose is to advance an ideological agenda, and acted to make drug treatment as readily available an option? If we come together, as a large, vocal and united constituency, we can advocate for policies that genuinely support maternal health and well being and create a true culture of life -- one that values the women who give that life.

Interested in the entire article? Read it here.

I had to laugh at the line describing pregnancy resource centers thus: "whose only real purpose is to advance an ideological agenda."

When you have the audacity to claim you are creating a culture of life by defending the deaths of a million and a half babies per year, you must be driven by something way beyond an ideological agenda.

Abortion advocates are truly religious fanatics protecting their sacred rite (abortion), their sacred priests (abortionists) and their sacred grounds (abortion clinics) with logic-defying religious jargon and rhetoric.

I know. I was there as a founding mother of the Second Wave of Feminism, who fought for abortion rights and participated in the sacred rite of passage - my own abortion in 1977. Thank God I eventually found my way out of this cult-like mentality and began thinking like an authentic human being who once was a "fetus" herself.

I continue to wonder how if liberals are so protective of "the little guy" they are so hardhearted when it comes to those most vulnerable and in need of our protection?

You can read more of my Pro-Life writing here. And look for pictures from the Blogs For Life and March for Life Monday night! See the ones I took last year here.

Barbara Curtis
MommyLife

January 19, 2007

The Family Research Council is a good example of an organization the has harnessed the capabilities of blogging to increase the effectiveness of their efforts:

As the pro-life message continues to advance, so too does the technology that carries the message. For the past year, FRC has been on the cutting-edge of the blogging movement, extending its influence on life and family issues to the online mainstream. On Monday, January 22, FRC is hosting its second Blogs for Life conference, featuring a star-studded line-up of congressional, media, and Internet leaders.

The event is free and highlights speakers such as: Sen. Sam Brownback (R-KS); Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA); David Prentice, Senior Fellow, FRC; Ramesh Ponnuru, Senior Editor, National Review; Peter Samuelson, President, Americans United for Life; Joe Scheidler, Founder, Pro-Life Action League; Jill Stanek, columnist, WorldNetDaily; Rob Bluey of The Heritage Foundation; and many more. For those of you who can't make it to Washington but want to develop a better understanding of how technology can be used to promote life, log on to our website for special live coverage of the event. Visit www.blogs4life.com for details.

As a participant in the conference, the FRC's support and sponsorship is greatly appreciated and I hope that other forward looking organizations will take advantage of this phenomenal opportunity to learn about the capabilities of weblog technology and network with individuals representing the new media. (click here for more information)

Operation Rescue’s A cry for justice kicked off this afternoon with a press conference and outreach at George Tiller’s Wichita abortion clinic, Women’s Health Care Services. Check out the report from their first day (click here).

A message from the No Room for Contraception Campaign

As the 34th anniversary of Roe vs. Wade approaches, the No Room for Contraception campaign reminds pro-life advocates that contraception fuels the demand for abortion. This fact is detailed in the article The role of contraception in increasing abortion . (Though this article covers the 1960s through the 1970s, we are working on an article which covers the period from 1980 - 2003)

Though abortion advocates claim that contraception is responsible for the declining abortion and pregnancy rates, several studies show that abstinence is the primary reason. Even so, I suspect these studies are incomplete - there has been a slight cultural shift on abortion, something the studies do not seriously take into consideration.

It is my belief that the primary reason for the abortion decline is not due to "improved" contraception but instead due to increased abstinence and the hard work of the pro-life movement. The nation's hearts and minds have been [slowly] changing, and as a result abortion has become less and less of an option for those involved in an unexpected pregnancy.

Despite the reductions, abortion still remains a backup for failed contraception. Abortion is far from being rare and contraception still drives the demand for it. In fact, I should say that the contraceptive mentality, and not just contraception, drives the demand since many people don't even bother to use any contraception at all. When these same people are faced with an unexpected pregnancy, they often fall back on abortion as a way of controlling birth.

The answer to unexpected pregnancy and abortion is not more contraception, "comprehensive" sexuality education, or easier access. That formula has failed for decades, and has resulted in driving up pregnancy and abortion rates.

Silence or timidity on contraception is not the answer either. In an effort to appeal to the broadest range of people (and donors), some organizations refuse to address contraception. In the long run this only serves to preserve the culture of death by providing a supply of unborn children whose very creation stems from the contraceptive mentality and/or contraceptive failure. (Though there have been some lone voices in the desert, the movement as a whole has not addressed the issue.)

Part of the failure to address contraception stems from the “put out the fire” mentality – unborn children scheduled to die today won’t benefit from anything else but direct intervention. There is a point to this mentality – firefighters don’t sit around talking about how to prevent fires while watching a house burn, instead they put out the fire. But where this mentality falls short is that firefighters do give fire prevention classes when they aren’t fighting fires. The movement can do both, albeit with greater emphasis on the more urgent problem of abortion.

If the pro-life movement doesn't want to keep fighting the abortion battle in the trenches, and losing countless lives despite their best efforts, then it has to address the contraceptive mentality that has captured the hearts and minds of our nation. Until it does, the movement will always be fighting fires while never addressing the reason why these fires started in the first place.

If I still haven't made a convincing argument that contraception needs to be addressed by the pro-life movement, consider the defeat of several pro-life state initiatives in 2006. Opposition to these initiatives was headed by groups that receive Title X federal contraception funding, such as Planned Parenthood. While this funding may not have been used directly in their efforts to defeat these initiatives, it nevertheless freed up these organization's resources to do so.

As long as the pro-life movement fails to confront the issue of contraception, it will ensure a steady supply of federal funding to the very groups that work to defeat its legislative efforts.

It's time for a shift in strategy, and it's time to address the harms of contraception. Will this be addressed this upcoming weekend at the many conferences taking place prior to the March for Life? Sadly, the answer appears to be “no”…

In closing, abortion isn't the only harm posed by contraception, and we will continue to address these dangers throughout 2007.

conference speakers2.jpg

Dear Pro-Life Friends,

It's time to make final plans for Blogs4life, the second annual conference of pro-life bloggers. The event is hosted by the Family Research Council on Monday, Jan. 22, prior to and after the March for Life in Washington DC and will be show live, over the internet.

The conference program has expanded and is filled with noted pro-life leaders including:

  • Tony Perkins (President, Family Research Council)
  • Ramesh Ponnuru (National Review Online Senior Editor)
  • David Prentice (Senior Fellow, Family Research Council)
  • Peter Samuelson (President, Americans United for Life)
  • Joe Scheidler (Founder, Pro-Life Action League) – tentative
  • Paul Schenk (National Pro-Life Action Center)
  • Bobby Schindler (Terri Schindler-Schiavo Foundation)
  • Jill Stanek (WorldNetDaily Columnist, Pro-life Speaker)

The morning session will feature Senator Sam Brownback (R-KS) and Congressman Duncan Hunter (R-CA)!

The afternoon session includes a panel discussion, moderated by the FRC's Charmaine Yoest, on the New Media. During this time you can expect to interact with a lively group of pro-life bloggers, videocast experts, media consultants and movie makers. Click here for the complete schedule.

Blogs4Life is an excellent opportunity for individuals and organizations to network with pro-life bloggers and develop an understanding of how weblog technology can be used to strategically promote life and transform ideas into action as we move toward a post-Roe America.

You can show up at the door for all or part of the conference but we would be most grateful if you register before the event so that the FRC can make adequate accommodations for food and beverages.

For more information see: Facts , Details , Directions and Schedule .

Finally, please consider promoting the conference over the weekend by forwarding this email to your pro-life friends.

God bless you and give you peace!


march_for_life.jpg

Like many of you I'm heading for the March for Life later today. See you there!

Posted by Genevieve Parker at ContraceptionBlog.com

I found this article in The Sydney Morning Herald rather telling on many levels. First off, the author notes the following:

Have you ever wondered how young women still manage to fall pregnant accidentally when they have ready access to contraception and sex education? Have you ever concluded that it must be only the sloppy or irresponsible who face the horror of seeing two purple lines emerge from the plastic window of a home pregnancy test? I have cobbled together some statistics to show why this is not so, why young couples who take all the care in the world can still end up with a surprise pregnancy.

As one reads on, one comes to see that the author is making a point about contraception necessitating abortion, which she favors. I have to say that I find it refreshing that she at least admits some consistency in her argument; i.e. contraception and abortion are part of the same issue & cannot be separated from each other; and that, ultimately (over time), one leads to the other. In other words, contraception, at best pospones abortion but does not prevent abortion.

Last year you fought for the life of Andrea Clark, the woman whose life the Texas Health Care system decided was not worth living (more here and here). Now her family is fighting to get a law passed that will protect others:

Hi, My name is Lanore Dixon. I'm the sister of Andrea Clark, the patient at St. Luke's Hospital in Houston Tx who had to fight for her life against the hospital ethics committee death sentence.

I believe your readers were very helpful in allowing Andrea to continue life support until she died in her own time. Now my family and I are committed to changing the Texas law that allowed St. Luke's to play God with our sister's life. We've since learned of many other cases where hospitals played God. We want to change this law. The legislature is now in session and we need as many people as possible to take action in this effort.

If you could make mention of this in your blog and give us a link (www.texaspatientrights.org), it would go a long way to getting this law changed.

As always, thank you for your help.

Lanore Dixon


January 18, 2007

Our friends at Arizona Right to Life and Life Educational Corporation invite you to join thousands of others for a two-hour festival of life: "Mission Possible: Agents of Change." This joyful event will include energizing music, vendors, dynamic speakers, personal stories and an opportunity to be part of the growing effort to support women & their children.

Here are the details:

Each year, thousands of Americans across the country gather to honor the victims of the tragic January 22, 1973 Supreme Court Roe v Wade decision. "Mission Possible: Agents of Change" is designed to educate, motivate and mobilize Arizonans around the battle fo