John Jakubczyk, like a voice crying in the wilderness, hits the nail on the head:
With the three vetoes by Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano of three benign pro-life bills, one realizes that this is a governor connected with the culture of death and yet unconcerned that her vetoes will produce any political fall-out.Last week when she vetoed the fetal pain bill, it hardly raised a stir in the local media. The Arizona Republic did not print a story on the veto but merely put a short AP wire story on its website. My sources tell me that the Republic did not even mention yesterday's vetoes in Tuesday's paper.
The governor believes that she is invincible.I was tempted, but I didn't quote his entire article. You can read the rest here.Unless we, the people, do something about it, she may be right.
The press is covering for her. The Republic is her own personal rah rah sheet. It has not only hitched its wagon to her star, but acts with an arrogance that exclaims, "if we don't write about it, it didn't happen."
Remember this is the person while attorney general who allowed the 14-year-old ward of the court to fly to Kansas to have an abortion at 28 weeks.
This is the person who counseled Anita Hill while she lied about Clarence Thomas.
This is the person who has vetoed four pro-life pieces of legislation this year alone.
Can anything stir the pro-family pro-life movement into action? Is there a person who can rally the average person to stand up against this tyranny and disdain for the people?
The bottom line is that it is time for pro-lifers to get involved and elect a pro-life governor in Arizona (and every other state for that matter). Arizona is fortunate - the state has an excellent pro-life candidate for governor by the name of Len Munsil.
Related: Gov. Napoli-veto shattered her carefully crafted image as a moderate to conservative Democrat with a string of vetoes Monday that revealed her as a liberal activist. - more
And being a liberal activist is bad because...?
In fact, she is standing up to the tyranny of the social conservatives, who would dictate every facet of morality and private life if it were possible.
may she crush her opponent in November and be re-elected.
Napoli-veto has consistently oppressed the rights of the unborn and demanded legislation that is written exactly according to her agenda. She further takes it upon herself to determine whether or not, from a judicial standpoint, a bill is constitutional and whether or not law enforcement will "like" it. She also decides what will be enforced and what will not. Acting as law maker, executive, and judge, for the determinant of the unborn, sounds a lot more like tyranny than Josh's imaginary conspiracy of social conservatives.