Abortion Advocates Clearly Wrong: New Study Shows Premature Babies Feel 'Intense' Pain :: Abortion

Abortion: April 7, 2006
Abortion Advocates Clearly Wrong: New Study Shows Premature Babies Feel 'Intense' Pain

... premature babies feel pain as intensely, or even more intensely, than we do - UC London specialist in developmental neurobiology.

In a further debunking of the myth that children in the womb don't feel pain, here's yet another study, this time by a specialist in developmental neurobiology, that has found that premature babies feel pain as intensely, or even more intensely, than we do:

A research team from University College London analyzed brain scans of premature infants taken when blood samples were being drawn using a heel lance, reported BBC News yesterday. They found records of a surge of blood and oxygen to the babies' brains during the procedure, showing conclusively that the pain registered in the sensory levels of the brain.

"We have shown for the first time that the information about pain reaches the brain in premature babies," said lead researcher Professor Maria Fitzgerald, a specialist in developmental neurobiology at the Thomas Lewis Pain Research Centre at UCL

"Beforehand, although we could assume it, we did not know for sure that these babies could feel pain."

Dr. Paul Ranalli, professor of neurology at the University of Toronto, said last year in reference to the pain felt by premature babies, "The only difference between a child in the womb at this stage, or one born and cared for in an incubator, is how they receive oxygen--either through the umbilical cord or through the lungs. There is no difference in their nervous systems."

Few can forget that August 2005 report of a study hyped by abortion advocates that was conducted by a medical student who had worked for an abortion rights group and the director of a clinic that provided abortions - the one with a biased agenda that concluded that fetuses probably don't feel pain until around the seventh month of pregnancy.

(...) The report, published in The Journal of the American Medical Association, concluded that fetuses probably don't feel pain until around the seventh month of pregnancy. It drew immediate criticism from anti-abortion activists and other researchers. One of them, Kanwaljeet Anand of the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, predicted that it would "inflame a lot of scientists who are ... far more knowledgeable in this area than the authors appear to be."
(...) Douglas Johnson, legislative director of the National Right to Life Committee in Washington, said the research is tarnished with bias.

(...) "If Congress wants an objective evaluation of whether calves and lambs are being slaughtered humanely, they will not rely too much on the report from the operators of slaughterhouses," he said.

The two "take home" messages here are that "the only difference between a child in the womb at this stage, or one born and cared for in an incubator, is how they receive oxygen--either through the umbilical cord or through the lungs", and that unborn babies are are not lambs for slaughter in the abortion mill "slaughterhouses" across America!

Cross-posted: Hyscience

Posted by richard at April 7, 2006 12:56 PM

Subscribe with Bloglines

Get our free Daily Newsletter filled with Pro-Life News and Commentary.

Prior Articles:

Vitae Caring Foundation's Bottom Line - May 09, 2008
Hitler, the Nazis and Assisted Suicide - May 03, 2008
Nationwide United Action Call Today - Saturday May 3rd - May 02, 2008
New Stanek WND column, "Abortion as art sport" - Apr 23, 2008
Baby In Womb, Awaiting - Apr 20, 2008
"I Must Have a Male Child." -- Sex Selection Abortions Continue in "Modern" India. - Apr 17, 2008
New Stanek WND column, "Barack Obama and the sex life of 12 year olds" - Apr 16, 2008
Video - Spread the news please - Video - Father Pavone Discusses The Reality Of Abortion - Apr 09, 2008

Trackback

TrackBack URL for this entry (note that all trackbacks from posts without a link to this entry will be considered spam and deleted):

Comments

The full story, in the UK News Telegraph, notes that all the infants in the study were all born after at least 24 weeks', and some as much as 37 weeks', gestation. It does not state at what gestational equivalent age the studies were actually performed (presumably the infants had been in neonatal intensive care for some time before the experiments were conducted), so they were likely older even than that. Some are obviously nearly full-term. Previous opinion held that fetuses could feel pain at 26 weeks, with some controversy whether they could do so earlier - so this study adds nothing that was not already known. It strengthens the indirect evidence of pain response, but does not change the consensus opinion on its appearance in fetal development.

As for "biased studies", that is nonsense. The objection to the previous study was on the basis of the fact that two of the six authors had - in one case temporarily - worked for abortion service providers, not that the study was methodologically flawed. That is not an objection, it is mere political harassment. But if that issue is relevant, we might note that the Dr. Ranalli of the above study is Executive Director of a bioethics "research" institute that somehow only seems to find evidence to support anti-choice myths such as post-abortion trauma and euthanasia epidemics, and that he has testifed before state legislatures on "partial-birth abortion" - a term that has no medical meaning. Will he disqualify his own study, given his suspicious background?

Posted by: Kevin T. Keith on April 7, 2006 3:59 PM


Disclaimer: The statements and articles listed here, and any opinions, are those of the writers alone, and neither are opinions of nor reflect the views of ProLifeBlogs. Aggregated content created by others is the sole responsibility of the writers and its accuracy and completeness are not endorsed or guaranteed. This goes for all those links, too: ProLifeBlogs has no control over the information you access via such links, does not endorse that information, cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided or any analysis based thereon, and shall not be responsible for it or for the consequences of your use of that information.