Alito Responds to Specter on Abortion

| No Comments

Earlier today, Judge Samuel Alito was questioned by U.S. Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA), Chariman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, concerning his views on judicial precedents involving abortion.

Steven Ertelt at LifeNews has published three articles which summarize the session, capture the highlights and provide good perspective:

Samuel Alito Defends Pro-Life Views Against Abortion in 1985 Memos
Alito said he would "approach the question [of abortion] with an open mind." … [Regarding his 1985 statement that indicted there is no right to abortion] he said, "That was a true expression of my views at the time”
Abortion Precedent in Roe Not Necessarily Permanent, Samuel Alito Says
Alito did not go as far as Chief Justice John Roberts did when he described Roe as "embedded" in the culture, though Roberts also explained how a Supreme Court precedent like Roe v. Wade could be overturned.
Samuel Alito Defends Opinion on Spousal Notification for Abortions Law
During his hearings in the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday, Samuel Alito defended his decision in a case that eventually went to the Supreme Court that involved a Pennsylvania law limiting abortions. One aspect of the law allowed husbands to know when their wives were considering an abortion of their child.
During their discussion on Roe v. Wade and related rulings, Alito made the following statements:

stare decisis – “It's not an exorable command, but it is a general presumption that courts are going to follow prior precedents.” He later added, “And the presumption is that the court will follow its prior precedents. There needs to be a special justification for overruling a prior precedent.”

Privacy: I do agree that the Constitution protects a right to privacy. And it protects the right to privacy in a number of ways. The Fourth Amendment certainly speaks to the right of privacy. People have a right to privacy in their homes and in their papers and in their persons. And the standard for whether something is a search is whether there's an invasion of a right to privacy, a legitimate expectation of privacy.

The Constitution: The principles don't change. The Constitution itself doesn't change. But the factual situations change. And, as new situations come up, the principles and the rights have to be applied to them.

For those interested in more, the Washington Post has published the full transcript. Of particular interest is the exchange between Sen. Specter and Judge Alito on the precedent of Casey:

SPECTER: Do you agree that Casey is a super-precedent or a super stare decisis, as Judge Luttig said?

ALITO: Well, I personally would not get into categorizing precedents as super-precedents or super-duper precedents or any... I agree with the underlying thought that when a precedent is reaffirmed, that strengthens the precedent.

Regarding the 1985 memo in which Alito said that, in his view, there was not a constitutional right to abortion:
Specter: Let me come now to the statement you made in 1985 that the Constitution does not provide a basis for a woman's right to an abortion. Do you agree with that statement today, Judge Alito?

ALITO: Well, that was a correct statement of what I thought in 1985 from my vantage point in 1985, and that was as a line attorney in the Department of Justice in the Reagan administration.

Today, if the issue were to come before me, if I am fortunate enough to be confirmed and the issue were to come before me, the first question would be the question that we've been discussing, and that's the issue of stare decisis.

And if the analysis were to get beyond that point, then I would approach the question with an open mind and I would listen to the arguments that were made.

SPECTER: So you would approach it with an open mind notwithstanding your 1985 statement?

ALITO: Absolutely, Senator. That was a statement that I made at a prior period of time when I was performing a different role.

And as I said yesterday, when someone becomes a judge, you really have to put aside the things that you did as a lawyer at prior points in your legal career and think about legal issues the way a judge thinks about legal issues.

SPECTER: Well, Judge Alito, coming to the role you had in the solicitor general's office where you wrote the memorandum in the Thornburg case urging restriction and ultimate appeal of Roe, that was in your capacity as an advocate. And I have seen your other statements that the role of an advocate is different from the role of a judge.

But when you made the statement that the Constitution did not provide for the right to an abortion, that was in a statement you made where you were looking to get a job, a promotion, within the federal government. So there's a little difference between the 1985 statement and your advocacy role in the Thornburg memorandum, isn't there?

ALITO: Well, there is, Senator. And what I said was that that was a true expression of my views at the time, the statement in the 1985 appointment form that I filled out. It was a statement that I made at a time when I was a line attorney in the Department of Justice.

I'm not saying that I made the statement simply because I was advocating the administration's position. But that was the position that I held at the time. And that was the position of the administration.

In a process that is designed to make speeches rather than elicit information; Alito's answers were adequate if not good. From Captain's Quarters:
It looks like Alito has run the abortion gauntlet with Specter. This appears to have been one of the "subtle minuets" that got mentioned in yesterday's hearing. Specter ran through the questions rather quickly after hearing the components of answers that made Alito appear most moderate on the question. An old prosecutor himself, I expect that Specter knew exactly what answers he would get from Alito -- yet another indication that Specter is back on the reservation.
Not all pro-life readers will be pleased with Alito's answers because they provide no guarantee that Alito will vote to reverse abortion related precedents. However, his answers represent those of a strict constructionist who will follow the constitution rather than legislating from the bench.

Posts by pro-life bloggers related to the Supreme Court hearings are aggregated here.

Talk Back - leave a comment



twittericonsm.png

button02b.gif

Categories

Archives

Pro-Life Articles

add your site
RealChoice Mar 19, 2010, 1:08 am
Pro-Life News Mar 19, 2010, 4:25 am
Pro-Life News Mar 19, 2010, 4:29 am
Pro-Life News Mar 19, 2010, 4:31 am
Pro-Life News Mar 19, 2010, 4:32 am
Pro-Life News Mar 19, 2010, 4:35 am
Pro-Life News Mar 19, 2010, 4:45 am
Pro-Life News Mar 19, 2010, 4:51 am
Pro-Life News Mar 19, 2010, 4:53 am
Pro-Life News Mar 19, 2010, 5:03 am
Pro-Life News Mar 19, 2010, 5:09 am
Pro-Life News Mar 19, 2010, 5:11 am
Papa Mike's Blog Mar 19, 2010, 4:38 am
Papa Mike's Blog Mar 19, 2010, 4:40 am
Papa Mike's Blog Mar 19, 2010, 4:43 am
Hispanic Pundit Mar 19, 2010, 4:26 am
FREEDOM EDEN Mar 18, 2010, 8:05 pm
FREEDOM EDEN Mar 18, 2010, 8:35 pm
Spero News Mar 18, 2010, 7:00 pm
Spero News Mar 18, 2010, 7:00 pm
Spero News Mar 18, 2010, 7:00 pm
Journey of a Catholic Nerd Writer Mar 17, 2010, 4:50 pm
Hispanic Pundit Mar 19, 2010, 3:20 am
Spero News Mar 18, 2010, 7:00 pm
Defend Us In Battle... Mar 19, 2010, 12:57 am
Catholic Mommy Brain Mar 19, 2010, 1:03 am
Catholic Fire Mar 18, 2010, 8:40 pm
Caffeinated Thoughts Mar 19, 2010, 12:21 am
Blowing San #1 Mar 19, 2010, 1:00 am
Blowing San #1 Mar 19, 2010, 1:00 am
Blowing San #1 Mar 19, 2010, 1:00 am
Is Anybody There? Mar 18, 2010, 8:02 pm
The Black Kettle Mar 19, 2010, 1:43 am
Spero News Mar 18, 2010, 7:00 pm
Spero News Mar 18, 2010, 7:00 pm
Spero News Mar 18, 2010, 7:00 pm
Spero News Mar 18, 2010, 7:00 pm
Spero News Mar 18, 2010, 7:00 pm
Karen Edmisten Mar 18, 2010, 8:01 pm
Journey of a Catholic Nerd Writer Mar 11, 2010, 6:13 pm
The Ohio Anglican.blog Mar 19, 2010, 1:03 am
Pro-Life Action of Oregon Mar 19, 2010, 12:22 am
Pro-Life Action of Oregon Mar 19, 2010, 12:17 am
Kevin McCullough's TownHall Blog Mar 18, 2010, 5:13 am
jillstanek.com Mar 19, 2010, 12:57 am
Gribbit's Word Mar 18, 2010, 11:56 pm
Stop The ACLU Mar 19, 2010, 12:19 am
To Be a Mother Mar 18, 2010, 4:16 pm
THE PASSIONATE PRO-LIFER Mar 18, 2010, 4:35 pm
The Ohio Anglican.blog Mar 19, 2010, 12:03 am
THE LAMB ON THE ALTAR Mar 19, 2010, 12:01 am
My Domestic Church Mar 18, 2010, 11:30 pm
MICHNEWS.COM Mar 19, 2010, 1:56 am
Guarino Mar 18, 2010, 10:34 pm
BIG BLUE WAVE Mar 18, 2010, 6:56 pm
Adam's Blog Mar 18, 2010, 10:53 pm
40 Days for Life Mar 18, 2010, 11:02 pm
NoisyRoom.net Mar 18, 2010, 9:58 pm
My Chocolate Heart Mar 18, 2010, 10:29 pm
jillstanek.com Mar 18, 2010, 11:18 pm
Veritas - a Blog by Sharon Hughes Mar 18, 2010, 2:54 pm
NoisyRoom.net Mar 18, 2010, 8:35 pm
NoisyRoom.net Mar 18, 2010, 9:06 pm
Just thinking... Mar 18, 2010, 9:25 pm
jillstanek.com Mar 16, 2010, 5:30 pm
jillstanek.com Mar 17, 2010, 12:03 am
jillstanek.com Mar 17, 2010, 8:46 am
jillstanek.com Mar 17, 2010, 8:29 am
jillstanek.com Mar 17, 2010, 12:26 pm
jillstanek.com Mar 17, 2010, 12:59 pm
jillstanek.com Mar 17, 2010, 3:00 pm
jillstanek.com Mar 17, 2010, 4:32 pm
jillstanek.com Mar 18, 2010, 11:08 am
jillstanek.com Mar 18, 2010, 1:43 pm
jillstanek.com Mar 18, 2010, 3:00 pm
jillstanek.com Mar 18, 2010, 2:00 pm
jillstanek.com Mar 18, 2010, 3:19 pm
jillstanek.com Mar 18, 2010, 6:14 pm
Isn't It Rich Mar 18, 2010, 3:51 pm
Hawaii Right to Life Mar 18, 2010, 11:11 am
Spero News Mar 17, 2010, 7:00 pm
Spero News Mar 17, 2010, 7:00 pm
Deacon's Blog Mar 18, 2010, 8:43 pm
DEACON FOR LIFE Mar 18, 2010, 9:16 pm
DEACON FOR LIFE Mar 18, 2010, 4:29 pm
έχω ζωη Mar 18, 2010, 8:44 pm
THE PASSIONATE PRO-LIFER Mar 18, 2010, 1:43 pm
Stop The ACLU Mar 18, 2010, 8:19 pm
Spero News Mar 18, 2010, 8:19 pm
Spero News Mar 18, 2010, 8:19 pm
Dakota Voice (Blog) Mar 18, 2010, 7:39 pm
Christian Newswire: All Releases Mar 18, 2010, 9:29 pm
Pundit & Pundette Mar 18, 2010, 6:08 pm
Pundit & Pundette Mar 18, 2010, 6:27 pm
MandM Mar 18, 2010, 7:20 pm
LifeSiteNews.com Headlines Mar 18, 2010, 7:27 pm
LifeSiteNews.com Headlines Mar 18, 2010, 7:27 pm
LifeSiteNews.com Headlines Mar 18, 2010, 7:27 pm
LifeSiteNews.com Headlines Mar 18, 2010, 7:27 pm
LifeSiteNews.com Headlines Mar 18, 2010, 7:27 pm
LifeSiteNews.com Headlines Mar 18, 2010, 7:27 pm
LifeSiteNews.com Headlines Mar 18, 2010, 7:27 pm
LifeNews Mar 18, 2010, 7:26 pm
LifeNews Mar 18, 2010, 7:26 pm
LifeNews Mar 18, 2010, 7:26 pm
LifeNews Mar 18, 2010, 7:26 pm
LifeNews Mar 18, 2010, 7:26 pm
LifeNews Mar 18, 2010, 7:26 pm
Laura Echevarria Mar 18, 2010, 5:12 pm
jillstanek.com Mar 18, 2010, 6:14 pm
Hyscience Mar 18, 2010, 6:28 pm
Hawaii Right to Life Mar 18, 2010, 7:57 am
Hawaii Right to Life Mar 18, 2010, 8:10 am
FREEDOM EDEN Mar 18, 2010, 1:09 pm
CNSNews.com Headlines Mar 18, 2010, 1:20 pm
Christian Newswire: All Releases Mar 18, 2010, 8:04 pm
Americans United for Life Blog Mar 18, 2010, 6:26 pm
Mount Virtus Mar 18, 2010, 5:47 pm
The Black Kettle Mar 18, 2010, 5:57 pm
Sudan Watch Mar 18, 2010, 6:19 pm
Secondhand Smoke Mar 18, 2010, 5:28 pm
Chesapeake Cove Mar 18, 2010, 12:33 pm
A Catholic Life Mar 18, 2010, 5:43 pm
Values Voter News Mar 18, 2010, 6:03 pm
UofT Students for Life Mar 18, 2010, 4:08 pm
Threshing Grain Mar 18, 2010, 12:36 pm
Political Byline Mar 18, 2010, 2:36 pm
NoisyRoom.net Mar 18, 2010, 5:16 pm
The Chatterbox Chronicles Mar 18, 2010, 11:22 am
The Black Kettle Mar 18, 2010, 5:13 pm
Sudan Watch Mar 18, 2010, 4:23 pm
Sudan Watch Mar 18, 2010, 5:19 pm
Stop Illinois FOCA Mar 17, 2010, 2:53 pm
Stop Illinois FOCA Mar 18, 2010, 4:42 pm
Conservative Heritage Times Mar 18, 2010, 5:10 pm
CNSNews.com Headlines Mar 18, 2010, 9:52 am
Christian Newswire: All Releases Mar 18, 2010, 6:29 pm
Christian Newswire: All Releases Mar 18, 2010, 6:42 pm
Catholic Fire Mar 18, 2010, 11:47 am
Blowing San #1 Mar 18, 2010, 4:59 pm
Operation Rescue West Mar 18, 2010, 10:12 am
NoisyRoom.net Mar 18, 2010, 4:05 pm
My Domestic Church Mar 18, 2010, 4:30 pm
Moral Outcry Mar 18, 2010, 4:21 pm
MICHNEWS.COM Mar 18, 2010, 6:42 pm
MICHNEWS.COM Mar 18, 2010, 6:46 pm
MICHNEWS.COM Mar 18, 2010, 6:54 pm
MICHNEWS.COM Mar 18, 2010, 6:50 pm
MICHNEWS.COM Mar 18, 2010, 6:59 pm
MICHNEWS.COM Mar 18, 2010, 7:02 pm
LifeSiteNews.com Headlines Mar 18, 2010, 4:27 pm
LifeSiteNews.com Headlines Mar 18, 2010, 4:27 pm
JivinJehoshaphat Mar 18, 2010, 8:22 am
JivinJehoshaphat Mar 18, 2010, 8:43 am
Hyscience Mar 18, 2010, 3:30 pm
Hyscience Mar 18, 2010, 3:13 pm
Hyscience Mar 18, 2010, 3:59 pm
faithmouse Adjunct Blogmentary Mar 18, 2010, 4:20 pm
Dr Roy's Thoughts Mar 18, 2010, 4:10 pm
The Black Kettle Mar 18, 2010, 3:31 pm
The Black Kettle Mar 18, 2010, 3:26 pm
Sudan Watch Mar 18, 2010, 3:20 pm
Sudan Watch Mar 18, 2010, 11:16 am
Sudan Watch Mar 18, 2010, 4:19 pm
DEACON FOR LIFE Mar 18, 2010, 4:16 pm
Conservative Heritage Times Mar 18, 2010, 3:20 pm
CNSNews.com Headlines Mar 18, 2010, 9:06 am
CNSNews.com Headlines Mar 18, 2010, 10:55 am
Christian Newswire: All Releases Mar 18, 2010, 5:10 pm
Christian Newswire: All Releases Mar 18, 2010, 5:26 pm
Catholic Fire Mar 18, 2010, 10:16 am
Catholic Fire Mar 18, 2010, 10:54 am
Catholic Fire Mar 18, 2010, 11:00 am
Blatherings Blog Mar 18, 2010, 3:44 pm
A Catholic View Mar 18, 2010, 2:42 pm
Pundit & Pundette Mar 18, 2010, 3:06 pm
Pro-Life Unity Mar 18, 2010, 7:35 pm
Political Byline Mar 18, 2010, 2:36 pm
OrthodoxyToday Mar 18, 2010, 9:38 am
NoisyRoom.net Mar 18, 2010, 1:46 pm
NoisyRoom.net Mar 18, 2010, 2:33 pm
NoisyRoom.net Mar 18, 2010, 3:00 pm
Moral Outcry Mar 18, 2010, 3:01 pm
InspireLifeNow Mar 18, 2010, 3:04 pm
The Black Kettle Mar 18, 2010, 2:45 pm
DEACON FOR LIFE Mar 18, 2010, 10:13 am
DEACON FOR LIFE Mar 18, 2010, 3:16 pm
Dakota Voice (Blog) Mar 18, 2010, 2:20 pm
Dakota Voice (Blog) Mar 18, 2010, 2:41 pm