Though it wasn't a slam dunk unbiased show, I will admit that Tim might have been right about it not being as bad as I thought.
I will post my review and quotes ASAP. For anyone who recorded it, listen to the final words.

Though it wasn't a slam dunk unbiased show, I will admit that Tim might have been right about it not being as bad as I thought.
I will post my review and quotes ASAP. For anyone who recorded it, listen to the final words.
Thanks Peter - we're looking forward to your comments. I'm also looking forward to watching the program - it hasn't aired on the West Coast yet.
Peter - I'll comment more later with a few positives but can say that I was disappointed with the program's extremely sympathetic presentation of abortion rights extremists, adoption of pro-abortion language and representation of pro-lifers as subversive strategists. Further, no attention (at all) was given to the unborn who suffer ...
representation of pro-lifers as subversive strategists.
Ummm....that's kind of what they are, though. The groups presented formulate strategies to make abortion more difficult to procure.
The final sentence (in the doc) was interesting. I'm not sure if it represented a bias: the statement was clearly true. My take on it is that, if one already presupposes a bias, it supported that presupposition. Certainly interesting, nonetheless, since ya gotta figure that everyone was watching was keeping a bias-score at home.