The nomination of Judge Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court appears to be pleasing some of the most ardent (pro-life) Bush skeptics. Today Stephen Peroutka and Paul Schenck issued a press release applauding the nomination.

Paul Chaim Schenck, director of the National Pro-Life Action Center (NPLAC)-- the uncompromising voice of pro-life America on Capitol Hill--and Stephen G. Peroutka, NPLAC chairman, have issued the following joint statement in response to President Bush's nomination of Judge Samuel A. Alito to replace Justice Sandra Day O'Connor on the Supreme Court of the United States:

"We applaud the nomination of Judge Samuel A. Alito to the Supreme Court of the United States. Had the current nomination cycle begun with his nomination on July 19 of this year, we believe that the country would be well on its way to truly returning the Court to its constitutional foundation.

"Judge Alito's professional qualifications for this position are clear, but his lone dissent in the Planned Parenthood v. Casey decision leads us to believe that he also has a firm grasp of an American view of law and justice that is necessary to fulfill his duties.

"We look forward to Judge Alito's confirmation hearing so that we might obtain a more complete understanding of his judicial temperament. We encourage him to reject the modern practice of concealing his judicial philosophy behind the 'Ginsberg Cloak of Silence.' To that end, NPLAC intends to submit the same 'Five Questions' in this nomination that it did during Judge Roberts' nomination. In the case of Harriet Miers, pro-lifers put principle over party and it is important that we maintain this practice from this point forward.

"Understanding the inherently flawed nature of Supreme Court precedent regarding abortion is nothing a nominee should be ashamed of, and stating that understanding in their confirmation hearing should not be considered something that disqualifies them for the job. In fact, such a clear understanding of our Constitution and how it applies to High Court decisions demonstrates that a candidate is imminently qualified for the position.

"Partisan members of the Senate must ignore the demands of the pro-abortion money machine, which dictates their policies, when considering this nomination and instead base their vote on Judge Alito's qualifications as a jurist.

"Finally, we wish to implore the members of the 'mainstream media'--who were all too happy to utilize the statements of pro-life conservatives in their coverage of Harriet Miers--to maintain the same level of interest and respect for those opinions as we now navigate this confirmation process."

Paul Chaim Schenck will be speaking at a press conference in front of the Supreme Court at 11:30 a.m. To view the five questions that NPLAC believes every judicial nominee should answer, visit www.NPLAC.org.

• Name a Pro-life US Supreme Court Justice - May 22, 2008
• Breyer undermining Roberts - Jul 26, 2007
• Supreme Court ruling hints at new abortion stance - Jul 20, 2007
• BAD FRUIT - Jun 25, 2007
• U. S. Supreme Court Protects Grassroots Lobbying From McCain/Feingold Broadcast Blackout Periods - Jun 25, 2007
• Will Free Speech Prevail? - Jun 11, 2007
• SCOTUS Okays Discrimination Against Christians? - Feb 21, 2007
• Justice Kennedy will vote with Us? - Nov 08, 2006