Second Thoughts about Roberts

| 4 Comments | 1 TrackBack

Joseph Farah has written an interesting commentary on WorldNetDaily.com today about how we have been manipulated into believing in the integrity of John Roberts, Bush's nominee to the Supreme Court.

I don't know about you, but I am growing weary of this whole process, and it is sometimes difficult for an outsider to know just who to believe. While virtually all the pro-life leaders have only praise for Roberts, the vast majority of prominent conservative observers have been very vocal about why Roberts is a poor choice.

Read more at Choose Life.

4 Comments

"Nearly every prominent conservative observer?" Uh, aside from Ann Coulter and this dude (who I've never heard of), who are you talking about?

Bush has passed more pro-life legislation than any president of the modern era. This Farah fellow considers him to be a great disappointment as a president. He's obviously not going to be happy with anyone. Robert's wife helps head up Feminists for Life. You won't get anyone better than that.

To the extent that this sort of thing makes it more likely that Roberts will be easily confirmed, I don't mind this sort of talk. To the extent that it makes those who join in it look like nutters, you probably should.

I never pay attention to World Net Daily, simply because they so often misrepresent their opponents, distort facts, and use such harsh language often against innocent things. In this case, I can think of a perfectly reasonable and very conservative explanation for Roberts' support for privacy rights. He's a conservative. He believes in small government. He thinks immoral behavior by two people in their own home should not be regulated by the government unless it's nonconsensual (or perhaps harmful enough that we should protect people from themselves, but this is optional for the view I have in mind). I have seen quite a number of people who oppose gay rights on some issues endorse this view with regard to gay sodomy. It may be that Roberts is right on board with that, and if so it wouldn't reflect that he's weak on abortion or any other issue. Smart people take nuanced positions, and therefore they don't toe the party line of more simplistic worldviews that don't always involve careful thought about how things fit together.

I also wouldn't discount that he'd step in to help a colleague on a case that he might not agree with as a return for a favor or to try to get more support from his partners for his own idiosyncratic cases that others might not as easily want to help him with. Unless you think there's some absolute moral requirement that we have to have laws against any immoral activity that might occur in the bedroom (which would be insane; we couldn't list all of them), then there's shouldn't need to be a moral objection to his helping them.

It's quite clear that John Roberts is far more conservative than his record proves. He's no Souter. Those who want to treat him as one, if they had their way, would give us Edith Clement instead, who we know is more moderate. Bush has served the pro-life cause with this nominess, as he has with virtually every decision he has made that has a bearing on pro-life issues. He's made the right calls on which things to pursue, and the pro-life cause has been furthered more because he isn't willing to stand behind things that don't have enough support to achieve. That's how someone willing to accomplish something does it. Those who want to fail will follow the advice of World Net Daily authors.

Anyone who has read my blog with any regularity knows that I have been on board with the Roberts nomination from the very first day. He SEEMS to be pro-life, and he SEEMS to be a strict constitutionalist, but without a paper trail it is nearly impossible to determine where he stands on anything.

For those of you whose allegiance is to President Bush, consider these facts: his appointment to Attorney General, pro-choice; his appointment to Secretary of State, pro-choice. Your devotion may be to the president, but my devotion is to a cause, namely overturning Roe v. Wade in my lifetime.

And for those of you who thought my post was about gay rights, YOU MISSED THE POINT. My bottom line is this: is John Roberts a strict constitutionalist or is he an activist? To pretend to know the answer with such little information as we have seems irresponsible.

John Ashcroft is about as pro-life as you get, and we have no indication whatsoever about Gonzales. The only thing we know about him is that he considered it his duty as a judge to decide whether a girl was morally mature enough to understand the issues involved in matters like abortion, and that says nothing at all about whether he would have recommended to her to have the abortion or whether he agreed with the law that allowed judges to take away from parents the right to make such decisions.

John Roberts is not a strict constructionist. He has made that clear. He thinks all such views are reductionistic. He doesn't think there are absolutist principles that you can just apply to every case no matter what else is involved with the case, and he thinks strict constructionists either have to do that or not be true to their strict constructionist principles. Of course, very few people are really strict constructionists in that sense, because he's right. You can't really be a strict constructionist in that way on every case. Scalia and Thomas certainly aren't, and they're the closest well-known figures who claim to be in that general area (Scalia isn't a strict constructionist but an originalist, and I don't know what name Thomas attaches to his view).

Talk Back - leave a comment


Receive Updates

Enter your Email


button02b.gif

Categories

Archives

Recent Comments

Prachi: "My son , 25 yrs old is an ..."

Anon: "Thanks for explaining that, I appreciate it. I ..."

ELyse Miriam: "Dear Anon, you raise a very important question ..."

Ed: "Joanne, you might not have seen evidence spelled ..."

Anon.: "PLEASE READ!!! This doesn't actually have anything to ..."

Joanne: "The heading "ARTL questions Palin's pro-life credentials" led ..."

Matt: "I am a veteran. Though I've been in ..."

Pro-Life Articles

add your site
Values Voter News Nov 20, 2009, 3:01 pm
Political Byline Nov 20, 2009, 9:51 pm
NoisyRoom.net Nov 20, 2009, 9:40 pm
LTI Blog Nov 20, 2009, 12:50 pm
Deacon's Blog Nov 20, 2009, 8:21 pm
Deacon's Blog Nov 20, 2009, 8:44 pm
Les Femmes - The Truth Nov 20, 2009, 4:10 pm
Les Femmes - The Truth Nov 20, 2009, 11:10 am
Flash Point Nov 20, 2009, 9:12 pm
Deacon's Blog Nov 20, 2009, 8:21 pm
Deacon's Blog Nov 20, 2009, 8:44 pm
Caffeinated Thoughts Nov 20, 2009, 8:51 pm
LifeSiteNews.com Headlines Nov 20, 2009, 8:25 pm
LifeSiteNews.com Headlines Nov 20, 2009, 8:25 pm
LifeSiteNews.com Headlines Nov 20, 2009, 8:25 pm
Spero News Nov 20, 2009, 8:20 pm
DEACON FOR LIFE Nov 20, 2009, 2:48 pm
Adam's Blog Nov 20, 2009, 7:24 pm
Adam's Blog Nov 20, 2009, 7:50 pm
Pope Benedict XVI Blog Nov 20, 2009, 1:26 pm
OKIE on the LAM Nov 20, 2009, 7:11 pm
Mount Virtus Nov 20, 2009, 7:01 pm
Mount Virtus Nov 20, 2009, 6:53 pm
Love Undefiled Nov 20, 2009, 6:42 pm
Love Undefiled Nov 20, 2009, 6:45 pm
Love Undefiled Nov 20, 2009, 6:43 pm
Jack Lewis Nov 20, 2009, 7:10 pm
Hawaii Right to Life Nov 20, 2009, 9:09 am
Hawaii Right to Life Nov 20, 2009, 9:19 am
Hawaii Right to Life Nov 20, 2009, 9:10 am
Dakota Voice (Blog) Nov 20, 2009, 7:10 pm
Chris Dickson Nov 20, 2009, 12:42 pm
Chris Dickson Nov 20, 2009, 12:23 pm
Chris Dickson Nov 20, 2009, 12:37 pm
Chris Dickson Nov 20, 2009, 12:57 pm
Values Voter News Nov 20, 2009, 11:01 am
Priests for Life Nov 20, 2009, 5:38 pm
Pope Benedict XVI Blog Nov 20, 2009, 1:14 pm
MICHNEWS.COM Nov 20, 2009, 8:40 pm
MICHNEWS.COM Nov 20, 2009, 8:34 pm
MICHNEWS.COM Nov 20, 2009, 8:50 pm
MICHNEWS.COM Nov 20, 2009, 8:55 pm
Love Undefiled Nov 20, 2009, 5:31 pm
LifeSiteNews.com Headlines Nov 20, 2009, 6:25 pm
LifeSiteNews.com Headlines Nov 20, 2009, 6:25 pm
LifeSiteNews.com Headlines Nov 20, 2009, 6:25 pm
just after sunrise Nov 20, 2009, 12:35 pm
Jeremiah Films Announcements Nov 20, 2009, 5:29 pm
Hyscience Nov 20, 2009, 5:55 pm
C-POL Nov 20, 2009, 5:48 pm
Americans United for Life Blog Nov 20, 2009, 5:45 pm
Voice of Revolution Nov 20, 2009, 5:50 pm
Threshing Grain Nov 20, 2009, 11:20 am
Pro-Life With Christ Nov 20, 2009, 5:35 pm
Pro-Life With Christ Nov 20, 2009, 5:35 pm
Pro-Life With Christ Nov 20, 2009, 5:35 pm
Pro-Life With Christ Nov 20, 2009, 5:35 pm
Pro-Life With Christ Nov 20, 2009, 5:35 pm
Political Byline Nov 20, 2009, 3:38 pm
Political Byline Nov 20, 2009, 3:57 pm
Political Byline Nov 20, 2009, 4:16 pm
PARENTING FREEDOM.com Nov 20, 2009, 5:16 pm
MICHNEWS.COM Nov 20, 2009, 9:06 pm
MICHNEWS.COM Nov 20, 2009, 9:02 pm
MICHNEWS.COM Nov 20, 2009, 9:09 pm
MICHNEWS.COM Nov 20, 2009, 9:12 pm
MICHNEWS.COM Nov 20, 2009, 9:19 pm
MICHNEWS.COM Nov 20, 2009, 9:17 pm
MICHNEWS.COM Nov 20, 2009, 9:22 pm
Lutherans & Contraception Nov 20, 2009, 11:45 am
LifeSiteNews.com Headlines Nov 20, 2009, 5:25 pm
LifeSiteNews.com Headlines Nov 20, 2009, 5:25 pm
LifeSiteNews.com Headlines Nov 20, 2009, 5:25 pm
LifeNews.com Pro-Life Headlines Nov 20, 2009, 5:25 pm
LifeNews.com Pro-Life Headlines Nov 20, 2009, 5:25 pm
LifeNews.com Pro-Life Headlines Nov 20, 2009, 5:25 pm
LifeNews.com Pro-Life Headlines Nov 20, 2009, 5:25 pm
LifeNews.com Pro-Life Headlines Nov 20, 2009, 5:25 pm
LifeNews.com Pro-Life Headlines Nov 20, 2009, 5:25 pm
LifeNews Nov 20, 2009, 5:25 pm
LifeNews Nov 20, 2009, 5:25 pm
LifeNews Nov 20, 2009, 5:25 pm
LifeNews Nov 20, 2009, 5:25 pm
LifeNews Nov 20, 2009, 5:25 pm
LifeNews Nov 20, 2009, 5:25 pm
Stop The ACLU Nov 20, 2009, 5:21 pm
Dr. Melissa Clouthier Nov 20, 2009, 4:40 pm
Spero News Nov 20, 2009, 5:20 pm
Defend Us In Battle... Nov 20, 2009, 4:35 pm
Defend Us In Battle... Nov 20, 2009, 5:09 pm
CNSNews.com Headlines Nov 20, 2009, 6:51 am
cause of our joy Nov 20, 2009, 11:37 am
cause of our joy Nov 20, 2009, 11:43 am
Pro-Life PA by Sue Cirba Nov 20, 2009, 11:11 am
Political Byline Nov 20, 2009, 3:38 pm
Political Byline Nov 20, 2009, 3:57 pm
Political Byline Nov 20, 2009, 4:16 pm
MCCL Blog Nov 20, 2009, 4:07 pm
MCCL Blog Nov 20, 2009, 4:29 pm
Les Femmes - The Truth Nov 20, 2009, 3:38 pm
Les Femmes - The Truth Nov 20, 2009, 10:38 am
John Smeaton, SPUC director Nov 20, 2009, 4:21 pm
Jeremiah Films Announcements Nov 20, 2009, 3:49 pm
FRC.org - Web Log Nov 20, 2009, 4:01 pm
FRC.org - Web Log Nov 20, 2009, 4:18 pm
Christian Newswire: All Releases Nov 20, 2009, 5:16 pm
Values Voter News Nov 20, 2009, 7:11 am
Secondhand Smoke Nov 20, 2009, 3:26 pm
Romans 15:4 Project Blog Nov 20, 2009, 8:47 am
ProLifeBlogs Nov 20, 2009, 2:00 pm
Mommy Life Nov 20, 2009, 2:12 pm
MCCL Blog Nov 20, 2009, 3:13 pm
Hyscience Nov 20, 2009, 2:41 pm
FREEDOM EDEN Nov 20, 2009, 7:50 am
FREEDOM EDEN Nov 20, 2009, 8:07 am
Stop The ACLU Nov 20, 2009, 3:20 pm
ETC: Everyday Thoughts Collected Nov 20, 2009, 3:15 pm
Dr. Melissa Clouthier Nov 20, 2009, 2:27 pm
DEACON FOR LIFE Nov 20, 2009, 9:52 am
Constitutionally Right Nov 20, 2009, 2:10 pm
Christian Newswire: All Releases Nov 20, 2009, 3:00 pm
Veritas - a Blog by Sharon Hughes Nov 20, 2009, 6:47 am
Values Voter News Nov 20, 2009, 7:01 am
Secondhand Smoke Nov 20, 2009, 2:24 pm
NoisyRoom.net Nov 20, 2009, 2:15 pm
Mommy Life Nov 20, 2009, 1:37 pm
Mod-Blog Nov 20, 2009, 9:03 am
LifeSiteNews.com Headlines Nov 20, 2009, 2:25 pm
The Common Room Nov 20, 2009, 7:46 am
Happy Catholic Nov 20, 2009, 7:49 am
FREEDOM EDEN Nov 20, 2009, 7:37 am
Spero News Nov 20, 2009, 2:20 pm
Spero News Nov 20, 2009, 2:20 pm
Spero News Nov 20, 2009, 2:20 pm
Spero News Nov 20, 2009, 2:20 pm
DEACON FOR LIFE Nov 20, 2009, 8:56 am
Vital Signs Blog Nov 20, 2009, 7:29 am
Vital Signs Blog Nov 20, 2009, 6:32 am
Secondhand Smoke Nov 20, 2009, 1:23 pm
Political Byline Nov 19, 2009, 11:50 pm
Political Byline Nov 19, 2009, 3:19 pm
Political Byline Nov 19, 2009, 7:57 pm
Political Byline Nov 20, 2009, 12:22 am
OrthodoxyToday Nov 20, 2009, 6:21 am
OrthodoxyToday Nov 20, 2009, 7:33 am
Lutherans & Contraception Nov 20, 2009, 8:04 am
Love Undefiled Nov 20, 2009, 12:55 pm
Les Femmes - The Truth Nov 20, 2009, 1:10 pm
Les Femmes - The Truth Nov 20, 2009, 8:10 am
The Interim Nov 20, 2009, 12:34 pm
Hillbilly White Trash Nov 20, 2009, 7:09 am
Sudan Watch Nov 20, 2009, 12:42 pm
Sudan Watch Nov 20, 2009, 12:54 pm
Sudan Watch Nov 20, 2009, 12:49 pm
Sudan Watch Nov 20, 2009, 1:00 pm
Stones Cry Out Nov 20, 2009, 12:31 pm
Stones Cry Out Nov 20, 2009, 12:36 pm
Spero News Nov 20, 2009, 1:20 pm
Soconvivium Nov 20, 2009, 12:34 pm
Constitutionally Right Nov 20, 2009, 12:32 pm
Constitutionally Right Nov 20, 2009, 12:32 pm
Christian Newswire: All Releases Nov 20, 2009, 2:32 pm
cause of our joy Nov 20, 2009, 7:20 am
Vital Signs Blog Nov 20, 2009, 6:18 am
Vital Signs Blog Nov 20, 2009, 6:28 am
Verum Serum Nov 20, 2009, 12:16 pm
UofT Students for Life Nov 20, 2009, 1:01 pm
Threshing Grain Nov 20, 2009, 6:47 am
Threshing Grain Nov 20, 2009, 6:51 am
ProLifeBlogs Nov 20, 2009, 11:58 am
ProLifeBlogs Nov 20, 2009, 12:18 pm
Mount Virtus Nov 20, 2009, 11:38 am
Mod-Blog Nov 20, 2009, 7:14 am
man with black hat Nov 20, 2009, 6:45 am
jillstanek.com Nov 20, 2009, 12:00 pm
Jack Lewis Nov 20, 2009, 11:27 am
The Interim Nov 20, 2009, 12:01 pm
Hyscience Nov 20, 2009, 11:16 am
Hyscience Nov 20, 2009, 11:35 am
Students for Life of Michigan Nov 20, 2009, 11:25 am
Dr Roy's Thoughts Nov 20, 2009, 12:03 pm
Soconvivium Nov 20, 2009, 12:01 pm
Soconvivium Nov 20, 2009, 10:42 am
Soconvivium Nov 20, 2009, 11:12 am
Blowing San #1 Nov 20, 2009, 11:48 am
BIG BLUE WAVE Nov 20, 2009, 6:22 am