Fighting for the Right-to-Life :: Euthanasia

Euthanasia: July 27, 2005
Fighting for the Right-to-Life

Richard at Hyscience posts a stunning example of where the slippery slope of considering hydration and nutrition as medical treatments can lead. Leslie Burke, who has a degenerative brain condition, fears food and drink could be stopped against his wishes when he can no longer speak. He has cerebellar ataxia - an umbrella term for nervous system disorders that cause a lack of co-ordination, but do not affect mental faculties.

Although Mr. Burke won a landmark ruling in 2004, supporting his right to receive artificial nutrition and hydration, doctors appealed the ruling, saying they could be put in an "impossible position."

Mr. Burke is now waiting to hear if the Appeal Court has upheld his right to life-prolonging treatment.

Incidentally, the story hit Richard close to home because, like Mr. Burke, he has Cerebellar Ataxia. Richard writes,

I'm ... glad I don't live in England, else I'd be in danger of being starved and dehydrated to death, especially since I've experienced numerous episodes of inability to speak, complete loss of coordination, and inability to care for myself.

Interestingly, I've also gone through numerous admissions to acute rehabilitation, and fortunately, at least for me, I am able to blog as I am doing now. On the other hand, I do live in Florida, so I may be in a worse boat than our friend in England. Of course I'll do my best to stay out of Pinellas County and Judge George Greer's jurisdiction, thinking in advance, I have a will to live instead of a living will.

More information: BBC News

Posted by plb at July 27, 2005 10:15 PM

Subscribe with Bloglines

Get our free Daily Newsletter filled with Pro-Life News and Commentary.

Prior Articles:

Mexico Lures Boomers with "Eutho-tourism" - Jun 05, 2008
Former SS Doctor accused of euthanasia honored by German medical group - May 27, 2008
Jack Kevorkian has a new fan - Mar 26, 2008
Australian Ends Life with Homemade "Suicide Robot" - Mar 19, 2008
Call for Action - Save Lauren Richardson! - Feb 02, 2008
The Sad Truth - Feb 01, 2008
Do not remove Lauren's feeding tube - Feb 01, 2008
Parents battle over life and death of daughter - Feb 01, 2008

Trackback

TrackBack URL for this entry (note that all trackbacks from posts without a link to this entry will be considered spam and deleted):

Comments

Thank you for posting this article. I have just completed a discussion on another forum regarding Terri Schiavo's case.

One poster argued that Terri's case was a civil case about Terri's rights only, and had nothing to do with the right-to-life issue. Terri's hastened death could not have been ordered by the court, except for the fact that the Florida law was changed to include feeding tubes as life support.

Another Florida law I have problems with is the one that gives an adulterous spouse the legal ability to speak for a disabled spouse, when that spouse's life is at stake. The possibility of conflict of interest is too great, in my opinion.

As I stated in the other forum, it is our duty as citizens to question laws passed that endanger the humanity of any nation.

Posted by: Georgia on July 28, 2005 12:38 PM


Disclaimer: The statements and articles listed here, and any opinions, are those of the writers alone, and neither are opinions of nor reflect the views of ProLifeBlogs. Aggregated content created by others is the sole responsibility of the writers and its accuracy and completeness are not endorsed or guaranteed. This goes for all those links, too: ProLifeBlogs has no control over the information you access via such links, does not endorse that information, cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided or any analysis based thereon, and shall not be responsible for it or for the consequences of your use of that information.